Hello Denis,
* On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:31:32AM +0100 Denis Excoffier wrote:
> Under some circumstances (detailed below), the command:
>
> mv file1 file2
> produces
> mv: cannot move `file1' to `file2': Device or resource busy
Bloda? (http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/) I reported the exact same
Hi,
I am developing a diskless embedded system (aka the target) that uses Linux as
its Operating system. The target connects directly to my PC (XP).
I would like to boot the target to an NFS server, where is will get the file
system.
I would like to use the Cygwin NFS server in the following ma
Hi...
At present I am using cygwin 1.5 mainly, but I have also started to
migrate over to 1.7. Everything works quite well, but I encountered a
problem with the tail command. Obviously the + syntax does no longer
work in 1.7
In 1.5 when I call eg.
tail +3 /path/to/some/file
I get the whole
--- Mer 28/10/09, Roland Schwingel ha scritto:
> Hi...
>
> At present I am using cygwin 1.5 mainly, but I have also
> started to migrate over to 1.7. Everything works quite well,
> but I encountered a problem with the tail command. Obviously
> the + syntax does no longer work in 1.7
>
> In 1.5
Hi Marco,
Thanks for your reply.
Marco Atzeri wrote on 28.10.2009 12:05:09:
> --- Mer 28/10/09, Roland Schwingel ha scritto:
>
> > Hi...
> >
> > At present I am using cygwin 1.5 mainly, but I have also
> > started to migrate over to 1.7. Everything works quite well,
> > but I encountered a pro
Hi Roland,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:15, Roland Schwingel wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
Quoted e-mail edited; please see http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
> Marco Atzeri wrote on 28.10.2009 12:05:09:
>> --- Mer 28/10/09, Roland Schwingel ha scritto:
>>
>> the manual
On Oct 28 00:51, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> On 2009-10-19 21:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 19 21:18, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> >>
> >>Hope this helps.
> >
> >It does. The value of $PATH is used without checking if $PATH
> >exists. I fixed that in CVS.
> Thank you. Let's wait until 1.7.0-63 n
Hi...
When evaluating 1.7 I do also conduct some speed tests with cygwin 1.5.
I am using 1.5.25 und 1.7.0-62 on windows xp sp3 32bit here for my tests
on a quad core machine with enough ram.
It seems that 1.7 is around 10-25% slower in my scenarios here. I did
some compilation tests. Each te
Hi,
I have just installed release 1.7 under Windows 7, 64bit. The
setup.exe program seems to have changed and you can't any longer set
the Default Text File Type to DOS/Text. I have a lot of scripts that
won't run under bash as long as the extra CR's are not removed. I know
of the tool doc2unix, h
On 10/28/2009 1:52 AM, Kurt Harriger wrote:
I was having some trouble with text based emacs under cygwin.
The C-x C-c to exit was for some reason being interpreted as C-x C-g.
After some googling around I found that export CYGWIN=tty seemed to fix the key
sequence, however this also introduced ne
On Oct 28 12:37, Roland Schwingel wrote:
> Any clues? I just made an additional test compiling stock
> libxml2-2.6.32 using the stock gcc3 coming with both cygwin versions
> and I am coming to roughly the same numbers. Is 1.7 truly slower
> than 1.5 or aren't all final optimizations done right now?
On Oct 28 14:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 28 12:37, Roland Schwingel wrote:
> > Any clues? I just made an additional test compiling stock
> > libxml2-2.6.32 using the stock gcc3 coming with both cygwin versions
> > and I am coming to roughly the same numbers. Is 1.7 truly slower
> > than 1.
Hi,
I just recently install cygwin using the setup.exe.
The problem is that i cant seem to use some common command e.g. mkdir,
ls without addding ./ in front? I am attaching the cygcheck output
here.
Did i miss any steps here?
Thanks in advance
Huang.
cygcheck.out
Description: Binary data
-
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:51, Kie Kyon Huang wrote:
> The problem is that i cant seem to use some common command e.g. mkdir,
> ls without addding ./ in front? I am attaching the cygcheck output
> here.
The output appears to show that you do not have Cygwin in your PATH.
Are you running this fr
when I type the who command within a Cygwin window, only an empty line is
returned.
The man page states that who prints info about users who are logged in.
What I have found so far is that
-H returns headers
-q returns # users=0
while who with the -a, -b, -d, -l, --lookup, -m, -p, -r, -s, -t,
Hi Corrinna...
> On Oct 28 14:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Whether 1.7 is faster or slower depends on what you're doing and on
what
> > OS you're running. For instance, scanning local directories is about
> > 60% faster in 1.7 while starting lots of processes is about 10% slower
> > on Vist
Hello all,
I'm still having this problem but I'm beginning to narrow it down.
Here's an example of the error I get:
"J:\trunk\svn\apl\win\bin\mk_cc:
/cygdrive/j/trunk/svn/apl/allos/bin/verbose: /usr/bin/sh: bad interpreter:
Permission denied"
I've upgraded to cygwin 1.7, and I'm running this o
On 10/28/2009 01:52 AM, Kurt Harriger wrote:
I was having some trouble with text based emacs under cygwin.
The C-x C-c to exit was for some reason being interpreted as C-x C-g.
After some googling around I found that export CYGWIN=tty seemed to fix the key
sequence, however this also introduced n
I recently upgraded from XP to Vista and started having problems with
svn (aka subversion). \cygwin\bin\svn.exe works when run from a cygwin
bash terminal but not from a Windows cmd prompt (not required, but
handy to be able to run svn from a cmd prompt when working with visual
studio, so that runt
You're still sending TOFU. Please stop.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:54 PM, briglass111 wrote:
> It didn't matter if I believed what I read on the internet or not, I couldn't
> get the IF-statement to work, and when I queried a unix user, he wasn't sure
Sounds like you need to associate with a bett
On 10/28/2009 05:29 AM, Stern, Eli wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a diskless embedded system (aka the target) that uses Linux as
its Operating system. The target connects directly to my PC (XP).
I would like to boot the target to an NFS server, where is will get the file
system.
I would like to us
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> --- Mer 28/10/09, Roland Schwingel ha scritto:
>> I get an error:
>> tail: cannot open '+3' for reading: No such file or
>> directory.
>>
>> Is this on purpose or an accident?
> probably, the last
>
> $ tail --version
> tail (GNU coreutils) 7.0
>
> don't accept any mor
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>You're still sending TOFU. Please stop.
>
>On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:54 PM, briglass111 wrote:
>>It didn't matter if I believed what I read on the internet or not, I
>>couldn't get the IF-statement to work, and when I queried a unix us
Hi,
I'm seeing a few things with mkdir and acl's I don't quite understand -
OS is Server 2008.
First, from the shell I see different behaviors with mkdir on 1.5.25 and 1.7.
On 1.5.25 ($ filever \\usr\\bin\\cygwin1.dll --a-- W32i DLL ENU
1005.25.0.0 shp 1,872,884 06-12-2008 cygwi
On 10/28/2009 09:51 AM, Kie Kyon Huang wrote:
Hi,
I just recently install cygwin using the setup.exe.
The problem is that i cant seem to use some common command e.g. mkdir,
ls without addding ./ in front? I am attaching the cygcheck output
here.
Did i miss any steps here?
Looks to me like s
On 10/28/2009 10:04 AM, Larry W. Virden wrote:
when I type the who command within a Cygwin window, only an empty line
is returned.
The man page states that who prints info about users who are logged in.
What I have found so far is that
-H returns headers
-q returns # users=0
while who with the
> before i knew that bash was white-space picky
I think most shells are, not just bash
> , i thought this may be a cygwin issue because i read a bit about people
> saying bash is different in cygwin than in unix
where? I've not ran into any instances where cygwin bash varies from unix
bash
>
On 10/28/2009 12:07 PM, Mark MacVicar wrote:
I recently upgraded from XP to Vista and started having problems with
svn (aka subversion). \cygwin\bin\svn.exe works when run from a cygwin
bash terminal but not from a Windows cmd prompt (not required, but
handy to be able to run svn from a cmd promp
On 10/28/2009 07:59 AM, Niels Hallenberg wrote:
Hi,
I have just installed release 1.7 under Windows 7, 64bit. The
setup.exe program seems to have changed and you can't any longer set
the Default Text File Type to DOS/Text. I have a lot of scripts that
won't run under bash as long as the extra CR
What is wrong with you people? What is the desire to continue posting in this
thread? I am a relatively inexperienced cygwin/unix user who had an honest
question and you people got so chafed up by it. If you are so insulted or
annoyed by my question, then find a mod or something and delete it, or
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:10 PM, briglass111 <> wrote:
>
> What is wrong with you people? What is the desire to continue posting in this
> thread? I am a relatively inexperienced cygwin/unix user who had an honest
> question and you people got so chafed up by it. If you are so insulted or
> annoyed
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I'm seriously puzzled. Could you please run
>
> $ strace -o ls.trace ls -l weird/
>
> and send the ls.trace file as attachment? Maybe there's some hint
> in it.
Done.
-SM
--
3 3 [main] ls 288 open_shared: name shared.5, n 5, shared 0x60FC
(wanted 0x
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:08 PM, Steven Monai wrote:
>> Since I don't care about the retaining the
>> permissions, and I now have a version of rsync on both sides that
>> allows me to use link-dest without copying permissions I am happy. If
>> someone wants to continue digging into this further I am
Charles Wilson cwilson.fastmail.fm> writes:
>
> ncurses is a package that provides character and terminal handling
> libraries, including 'gui-like' panels and menus. It is often used
> instead of termcap.
>
> This is a packaging bug fix, and an update to latest upstream.
>
> [[ compiled usin
Chris Francy wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:08 PM, Steven Monai wrote:
>> Could you re-run your Cygwin-1.7 test case with --itemize-changes added
>> to the rsync command-line? That should provide a hint at what Debian's
>> rsync thinks is different between its existing file copy and Cygwin's
>> s
Hi,
Using the latest 1.7 on XP SP3, installs seem to hang during the pre/post
install phases, as if it's being blocked by a BLODA. However, it persists
even after fully uninstalling any and every security-related item I could
find (I didn't have much), stopping and disabling almost every service,
Eric Backus wrote:
> I'm getting a segmentation fault when I try to use tput. The program runs
> successfully if you just ask it for a version number, or if asked for a non-
> existent capability, but gets a seg fault when asked about a real capability.
>
> $ tput sgr0
> Segmentation fault (core
NEWS:
=
This is a new upstream release. See CHANGES (URL below) for more
information.
IMPORTANT: This release will silently upgrade your Subversion
working copies to the 1.6 format, rendering them unusable with
previous major versions of Subversion.
Please see the release notes
http://subv
A new version of subversion is now available for download. This
version is built for Cygwin 1.7.
CYGWIN NEWS:
There was one test failure with Cygwin 1.7.
* All tests hang using the serf HTTP library. This package still
includes support for serf, but if you encounter problems, plea
On 10/28/2009 09:36 PM, Jeffrey Friedl wrote:
Once it's working, it's working, except that I can't start sshd as a
service. If I open a shell and run /usr/sbin/sshd by hand, it's fine.
Does any of this ring a bell?
Other than the part about sshd, no. As for sshd, since you've run it
by hand,
Dear Folks,
On NTFS systems that support real symbolic links (eg those with Vista)
the comand ln -s does *not* create a native symbolic link merely an old
style shortcut.
Will ln -s be chansed to support native symbolic links?
Also rm removes the target of the symbolic link not the link file.
I
On 10/29/2009 01:26 AM, Neil Mowbray wrote:
Dear Folks,
On NTFS systems that support real symbolic links (eg those with Vista)
the comand ln -s does *not* create a native symbolic link merely an old
style shortcut.
Will ln -s be chansed to support native symbolic links?
No, not until, at leas
42 matches
Mail list logo
