On Aug 15 00:39, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>
> > Why would DLLs need execute?
>
> because otherwise windows will refuse to load them, and the application
> you just launched which needs that DLL will fail with an ugly message
> about "Failed to initialize: 0xc005".
0xc000
On Aug 14 17:39, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/14/2009 2:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Aug 14 20:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Aug 14 14:16, Charles Wilson wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna, can you give this a try? (I'm happy to send you a compiled
version of the modified r
2009/8/15 Corinna Vinschen:
> Apparently `run XWin' doesn't work at all anymore, everything else seems
> to work fine. A shortcut starting XWin directly w/o run works fine as
well.
XWin is a GUI subsystem program, hence it doesn't need 'run'. (But of
course it ought to work anyway.)
Andy
--
Prob
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:49 AM, pressed
keys on his keyboard in the following order (sans the > at the
beginning of every line):
> (omitted for clarity)
I've seen this on occasion using Of All Things the Starter edition --
I had to turn off UAC in order for it to work, and now I dont like
MinTTY
Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> Here's an example:
>
> CYGWIN:
>
>
> c:\test>\cygwin\bin\unzip \dx4w801\dx4win_regexp.zip
> Archive: \dx4w801\dx4win_regexp.zip
> inflating: pcre3.dll
> inflating: regexp/freq1.txt
> inflating: regexp/qth1.txt
> inflating: Dx4win.exe
>
> c:\test>ls -l
> total
Morgan Gangwere wrote:
> Now, I'm off to pound nails and help set up for the Albuquerque
> International Balloon Fiesta.
>8o!... I told you we should have turned left at Albuquerque!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: ht
(Mostly for Dave Korn, but other opinions solicited):
How do you want me to handle updating gcc-tools-autoconf and
gcc-tools-automake? My preference would be to /not/ update them at all;
at least, not for a while. Reasons:
1) The current and soon-to-be-released gcc's, based on gcc-3.4.5 and
gcc
Charles Wilson wrote:
> /not/ update them at all;
> 1) The current and soon-to-be-released gcc's, based on gcc-3.4.5 and
> gcc-4.3.x, both still require autoconf-2.59 and automake-1.9.6
Good reasoning.
> So, as soon as I spin the "regular" cygwin autoconf-2.64 package, then
> our "standard" au
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 14 17:39, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 8/14/2009 2:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Given that the X server shortcut is just a `run /usr/bin/startxwin.bat',
is it possible that the new incarnation doesn't start cmd correctly?
>>> I built with -DDEBUG and it appear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A new release of diffstat, 1.48-1, is available for those testing cygwin
1.7, leaving 1.47-1 as the previous version.
NEWS:
=
This is a new upstream release. It also includes a patch to recognize .xz
files in addition to .lzma files (which will p
Either I'm too impatient, the question is too trivial for people to
bother with or too complex or lacking information to be answerable. As
I've not posted to this group before and have hardly used Cygwin I've no
idea which of the above is true. Anybody... please.
Bob
Bob Cowdery wrote:
Hi
I
Bob Cowdery wrote:
> Either I'm too impatient, the question is too trivial for people to
> bother with or too complex or lacking information to be answerable. As
> I've not posted to this group before and have hardly used Cygwin I've no
> idea which of the above is true. Anybody... please.
Compl
Bob Cowdery wrote:
> My end game was to install Cython and compile up some Python stuff
> which was written on Linux but needs to run on Windows. There are lots
> of shell scripts involved and the complete system does not lend itself
> to running native, hence the short-term need to run under Cy
Dave Korn asked:
> So, which version of zip did you use to create the archive in the first place?
I got the ZIP file from someone else. I don't know what program he
used, could have been WINZIP or something else.
I can't control how the ZIP file gets created, but I do expect that
when I unzip a
Dave
Thank you very much. I shall not forget -v now. It told me straight away
that I had stupidly forgotten to install the cygwin gcc but did have
MinGW gcc on the path which of course only understands Windows paths.
Regards
Bob
Dave Korn wrote:
Bob Cowdery wrote:
Either I'm too impatie
On 8/15/2009 10:46 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
It seems that emacs.exe (and even emacs-X11,exe) are both console
programs,...
Just for the record, so that emacs users don't get confused, the current
emacs and emacs-X11 packages in cygwin-1.7 don't provide an emacs.exe.
The emacs package provide
David
I run the other way around at the moment, Vista VM under Ubuntu. For
production it's a definite possibility to do as you say but there is I/O
involved that may not work too great on a VM so a lot of testing is
required and timescales are as usual too short.
Regards
Bob
David Christens
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 00:07, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
"Socket operation on non-socket" sounds like the problem that
I am just a little curious, is the discussion in this thread related to
what I flagged here:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-04/msg00143.
Karl (alias cygwin) wrote:
A way to find the answer would be to recompile your rsync without socketpair
support (as shown in my previous message)
and retry your test case.
May you give some more details? For example, should I rebuild under
Cygwin-1.5 or 1.7? with cygport (but which uses rsync
I wanted to try the case sensitivity feature of 1.7 on ntfs so I tweaked
the registry key and tried a kernel build.
Using the stock 1.7 tools I build a couple of cross tool chains with
binutils-2.19.1 and gcc 4.4.1 from source tar balls.
Using the cross tool chains I successfully built defcon
20 matches
Mail list logo
