Lev Bishop wrote:
> I'm sure glibc and newlib would both appreciate a good algorithm for
> tgamma(), if you felt like submitting one...
It seems that a good algorithm has yet been coded in the GAMMA
implementation of CERNLIB
(http://wwwasdoc.web.cern.ch/wwwasdoc/shortwrupsdir/c302/top.html,
http
On Oct 12 11:09, patrick ficheux wrote:
> In SANE (scanner project), the backend for snapscan failed to call shmget()
> with error EACCES (Permission denied) if the current user isn't
> administrator.
> When I'am logged as windows administrator, shmget() is called successfully
>
> In both case, t
In SANE (scanner project), the backend for snapscan failed to call
shmget() with error EACCES (Permission denied) if the current user isn't
administrator.
When I'am logged as windows administrator, shmget() is called successfully
In both case, the env. variable CYGWIN exists and this value is
Corinna Vinschen a écrit :
On Oct 12 11:09, patrick ficheux wrote:
In SANE (scanner project), the backend for snapscan failed to call shmget()
with error EACCES (Permission denied) if the current user isn't
administrator.
When I'am logged as windows administrator, shmget() is called success
I'm trying to use a Cygwin-linked program as a subprocess in Eclipse.
As spawned in this environment, if a SIGINT is sent to the process when
it is blocked reading from stdin (connected to a pipe in this case), the
SIGINT handler is not being called.
In an attempt to reduce the scenario to its ess
Spencer Bailey wrote:
I've created two different profiles in /etc. profile.1 and profile.2
which both contain different aliases etc. Based on the user logging in
I want to be able to run the correct profile.
Is it possible to put in a check in the /etc/profile that is a certain
user logs in to
Hi,
I've created two different profiles in /etc. profile.1 and profile.2
which both contain different aliases etc. Based on the user logging in
I want to be able to run the correct profile.
Is it possible to put in a check in the /etc/profile that is a certain
user logs in to run the profile. Lik
"Spencer Bailey" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created two different profiles in /etc. profile.1 and profile.2
> which both contain different aliases etc. Based on the user logging in
> I want to be able to run the correct profile.
>
> Is it possible to put in a check in the /etc/profile that is a certai
There a 50+ users and the two profiles can change on a monthly basis.
I don't want to have to maintain all the .profiles in users
directories.
Thanks
On 10/12/07, Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spencer Bailey wrote:
> >
> > I've created two different profiles in /etc. profile.1 and p
Spencer Bailey wrote:
I don't want to have to maintain all the .profiles in users
directories.
You don't have to. Add something like this to each ~/.profie:
. /etc/profile-class1
Unless users change classes frequently over time, you never touch the
.profile again. All changes happe
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>
> Thomas Dineen wrote:
>> Larry & All:
>>
>> I installed the same Cygin SW release on my 2 GHZ single core
>> Win 2000 desk top machine and it completed the "Running" part of the
>> installation in a timely manor.
>>
>> Is there a reason that it would take
Lev Bishop wrote:
> One immediately obvious problem with that implementation is that it
> doesn't handle negative parameter.
http://wwwasdoc.web.cern.ch/wwwasdoc/shortwrupsdir/c303/top.html
http://wwwasdoc.web.cern.ch/wwwasdoc/cernlib.html
Angelo.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.
On 10/12/07, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>
> Lev Bishop wrote:
>
> > I'm sure glibc and newlib would both appreciate a good algorithm for
> > tgamma(), if you felt like submitting one...
>
> It seems that a good algorithm has yet been coded in the GAMMA
> implementation of CERNLIB
> (http://wwwasdoc.web
jxt wrote:
>
> If I do a mkdir in a bash shell, it creates a folder that vista thinks is
> shared. Doesn't happen in the normal vista cmd shell. Doesn't happen on
> XP. And turning off sharing in vista takes forever (minutes).
>
> Worse, if I untar a tgz file, in cmd or bash, it creates a vista
Could the Cygwin OpenLDAP be updated to the latest stable release (2.3.38)?
Thanks,
Svend
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygw
nmehta wrote:
>
> I see the exact same behavior on every Cygwin/Vista installation I've
> done. This also happens when you create a file in Cygwin (just touch a
> file to test it). I can only presume that there is something
> fundamentally wrong about how Cygwin creates ACLs (Access Control Li
jxt wrote:
However, as this is the *users* mailing list, I'm wondering if
developers hang out here regularly.
They do.
Is there somewhere else to post that would get more developer attention?
Nope. This is the right place.
Well, maybe there is... I'm sure if you called one of them, for exa
nmehta wrote:
> Comparing a file touched in Cygwin vs a file created in Vista, the ACLs look
> different (Cygwin has 'Everyone' while Vista has 'SYSTEM', and Cygwin has
> 'Users' while Vista has the actual group you are in, or in this case
> 'Administrators'). If you remove the permissions on 'Us
If I run ls -l from /cygdrive/c it shows pagefile.sys as
--1 1595523072 Oct 12 10:43 pagefile.sys
I hate seeing the little '?' in my ls output. Normally, I just do ls
-ln and look up what user name and group the SSIDs match with.
However, with pagefile.sys you ge
DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
If I run ls -l from /cygdrive/c it shows pagefile.sys as
--1 1595523072 Oct 12 10:43 pagefile.sys
I hate seeing the little '?' in my ls output. Normally, I just do ls
-ln and look up what user name and group the SSIDs match with.
Howev
20 matches
Mail list logo
