Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Feb 1 17:36, Danny Smith wrote: > > cgf wrote > > > > How about if we eliminate -mno-cygwin from future releases and either > > provide our own mingw cross-tools or wrap the offerings from > > mingw.org? > > > I would miss -mno-cygwin. Gcc -mno-cygwin suppports symlinks, mingw > doesn't.

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:13:37AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > When I was maintaining cygwin's gcc, I often thought about eliminating > -mno-cygwin and just providing a pure mingw cross compiler in the > distribution. I really don't know why it wasn't done that way to begin > with. I have

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Feb 1 02:16, Christopher Layne wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:13:37AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > When I was maintaining cygwin's gcc, I often thought about eliminating > > -mno-cygwin and just providing a pure mingw cross compiler in the > > distribution. I really don't know why

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:24:50PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote: >On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:29:01AM -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote: >> >Matt Wozniski wrote: >> >>Before simply ripping out support for it, how about just adding a >> >>message to gcc s

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:39:46AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Feb 1 02:16, Christopher Layne wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:13:37AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > When I was maintaining cygwin's gcc, I often thought about eliminating >> > -mno-cygwin and just providing a pure

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:36:17PM +1300, Danny Smith wrote: >cgf wrote >> >> How about if we eliminate -mno-cygwin from future releases and either >> provide our own mingw cross-tools or wrap the offerings from >> mingw.org? > > >I would miss -mno-cygwin. Gcc -mno-cygwin suppports symlinks, min

mp3 tag editor for cygwin?

Can someone recommend a good command-line tool for editing mp3 tags? I need to edit a large amount of tags but the editing is a regular operation and could be easily scripted if I had a good command-line tool. thx Andy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem re

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

Christopher Faylor wrote: > If people are calling gcc from non-cygwin apps, then I don't think I > care too much. We can also provide a sed script to change "gcc > -mno-cygwin" to "i686-mingw-gcc". ... and if they do not like the name "i686-mingw-gcc", they could create symbolic links "gcc32 -

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:15:54PM +0100, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> If people are calling gcc from non-cygwin apps, then I don't think I >> care too much. We can also provide a sed script to change "gcc >> -mno-cygwin" to "i686-mingw-gcc". > > >... and if they do not l

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Feb 1 07:15, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:39:46AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Feb 1 02:16, Christopher Layne wrote: > >> Fine by me. Can we slip in removing text mounts at the same time? ;) > > > >Oh, now you spoiled the surprise. I hoped to get the text

RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On 01 February 2007 15:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 1 07:15, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:39:46AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Feb 1 02:16, Christopher Layne wrote: Fine by me. Can we slip in removing text mounts at the same time? ;) >>> >>> Oooo

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On 2/1/07, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 1 07:15, Christopher Faylor wrote: > We were going to replace text mounts with automatic file conversion using > "d2u": > > cygwin: CRLF line endings detected. Converting. I think this is too complicated. What about cygwin: CRLF line endings dete

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:14:28AM -0500, Lev Bishop wrote: >On 2/1/07, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>On Feb 1 07:15, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> We were going to replace text mounts with automatic file conversion using >>> "d2u": >>> >>> cygwin: CRLF line endings detected. Converting. >> >>I thi

cygwin/fork slowness due to UNCs in PATH

Just a quick comment.  I've been a long user of cygwin, and until recently noticed that cygwin was running extremely slow (it would take several seconds to fork off a command).  After debugging a while, it turns out that I had added UNC (\\ style windows) paths to my system PATH environment vari

RE: cygwin/fork slowness due to UNCs in PATH

On 01 February 2007 16:54, Song, Conrad W wrote: > it turns out that > I had added UNC (\\ style windows) paths to my system PATH environment > variable.  The removal of these (maybe slow network drives) from the PATH > (or disconnection from the network) solved the problem for me.  Perhaps > furt

missing dependencies for git

git requires curl and cpio, but these packages are not listed as dependencies. Mark Levedahl -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http:/

Permission denied problem

Hi, Is there a way to make cygwin executables to have the same permission rights as cmd.exe or other windows applications? For the moment I can't access a directory inside cygwin: $ ls /cygdrive/x/PPP/QQQ ls: cannot open directory /cygdrive/x/PPP/QQQ/: Permission denied Windows applications li

rxvt and "-fn 9x15bold"

When I launch cygwin's rxvt from within cygwin's X11, I use the option "-fn 9x15bold". I like the appearance of this font. When I launch cygwin's rxvt WITHOUT X11, with "-fn 9x15bold", I do not get the same font as I get with X11. When I launch rxvt WITHOUT X11, with the option "-fn 'Lucida Conso

Re: Compile-time detection of EOL translation mode (CLISP)

2007/1/30, Aaron Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Reini Urban (quoting Sam Steingold at the issue tracker page [1]) wrote: > The original problem is best solved by a > (setq *default-file-encoding* :unix) > in ~/.clisprc.lisp As mentioned in an earlier post, that doesn't work for *standard-output*,

Re: rxvt and "-fn 9x15bold"

David Arnstein wrote: When I launch cygwin's rxvt from within cygwin's X11, I use the option "-fn 9x15bold". I like the appearance of this font. When I launch cygwin's rxvt WITHOUT X11, with "-fn 9x15bold", I do not get the same font as I get with X11. When I launch rxvt WITHOUT X11, with the o

bad install ?

I can't figure out what I have done or not done to make .sh scripts NOT run in my seemingly ok cygwin install. My script.sh #!/bin/bash PATH=/bin:/usr/bin echo OK # bash -x script.sh + PATH=$'/bin:/usr/bin\r' + $'\r' : command not found + $'\r' : command not found Is it a Unix - DOS thing ? Tha

Re: mp3 tag editor for cygwin?

Andy Kriger wrote: Can someone recommend a good command-line tool for editing mp3 tags? My recommendation is to roll some simple Perl scripts using MP3::Tag, which works beautifully for me. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygw

Why is setup.exe downgrading my packages?

Hello! I have a quick question about setup.exe. Why is setup.exe trying to downgrade some packages (e.g. libpq4) when I install other packages. It's annoying. :-) I'm in the situation that I need both libpq-devel-8.1.4 and libpq4-8.1.4 for psycopg2 (python postgresql lib) to work. Whenever I ins

Re: Why is setup.exe downgrading my packages?

Mattias Brändström wrote: > I have a quick question about setup.exe. Why is setup.exe trying to > downgrade some packages (e.g. libpq4) when I install other packages. > It's annoying. :-) > > I'm in the situation that I need both libpq-devel-8.1.4 and > libpq4-8.1.4 for psycopg2 (python postgresq

Bash crashes during install

I hope this is not too vague... I have tried to install 1.5.24-2 using setup.exe and while the download appears to work correctly, as soon as the scripts are run, I get a series of crashes by bash (sorry about the german messages): Fehlgeschlagene Anwendung ash.exe, Version 0.0.0.0, fehlgeschla

Re: Cygwin developer needs Vista

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:27:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Does anyone have a copy of Windows Vista that they would be willing to >donate for the Cygwin cause? I'm feeling sort of guilty that Corinna is >stuck with all of the Vista issues but, since I don't have a copy of >Vista to use,

Re: Cygwin developer needs Vista

CGF, How about contacting this fellow at microsoft: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-12/msg00718.html -Bill On 2/1/07, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:27:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Does anyone have a copy of Windows Vista that they would be

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

I for one am not adverse to your proposition of separating the ming (mno-cygwin) functionality into its own script or program. This would reduce cygwin gcc's complexity and make it easier to port to cygwin and hopefully, mean nearer gcc versions faster. And by branching off the mno-cygwin, it ca

cygrunsrv problem

I am writing to report a bug in "cygrunsrv" cygrunsrv successfully installed my privoxy daemon service to be ran on each power up / restart. I was happy to find out.. But, before when I was trying to start it and query its status I could not or at least appeared that I couldn't. The "cygrunsrv

Re: Permission denied problem

Marko Loparic wrote: Hi, Is there a way to make cygwin executables to have the same permission rights as cmd.exe or other windows applications? You can try setting "nontsec" in your CYGWIN environment variable. See for details. -- Larr

Re: cygrunsrv problem

Wynfield Henman wrote: > The "cygrunsrv -Q " definitely is buggy to me. > When I started up my system "privoxy" is indeed up and running as it should > be. > > But, when I do a cygrunsrv -Q it shows that the service is stopped, > yet it isn't. There's no bug here, just some misunderstanding o

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

Wynfield Henman wrote: > I for one am not adverse to your proposition of separating the ming There's no such thing as "ming". The name of the project is MinGW, Minimalist GNU for Windows. > (mno-cygwin) functionality into its own script or program. This would MinGW has been a separately maint

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: > How about if we eliminate -mno-cygwin from future releases and either > provide our own mingw cross-tools or wrap the offerings from mingw.org? > This would mean that instead of saying 'gcc -mno-cygwin', you'd say: > 'i686