RE: man : List of all commands in a section

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Blake > Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 1:00 AM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: man : List of all commands in a section > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash

Re: man : List of all commands in a section

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Steven Buroff on 12/30/2006 5:47 AM: >> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com ^ http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR > Is it possible to get list of > * all section > * all commands in so

Re: Newbee problem at compile mtx scsi changer tool

Brian Dessent schrieb: > Pierre Bernhardt wrote: > >> checking for scsi/scsi.h... no >> checking for scsi/scsi_ioctl.h... no >> checking for scsi/sg.h... no >> >> I think the problem comes from here... >> >> [...] >> >> Could anybody help me to identify the

RE: Fatal Error w/ cygwin 1-5-23-*

I've been able to create a simple test case... #include int main(int argc, char** argv) { boost::filesystem::path path1("/etc"); // ok boost::filesystem::path path2("/tmp"); // boom! } ...and it appears to be a problem with creating more than one path object.

Re: Cygwin slower on one computer

Magnus Holmgren wrote: Magnus Holmgren wrote: I'm trying to figure out why Cygwin build things so much slower on one computer I have. We're talking about more than 3 times slower on a computer that ought to be a bit faster (Athlon64 at 2.2-2.4 GHz, compared to a Pentium M at 1.8 GHz). This

have you rebooted a Ford lately ?

I like to post these things on this list because everyone is aware of the tradeoffs and issues in OS choice. In my prior post: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2006-q4/msg00023.html I explained the problems with graphics versus information and cultural biases towards one or the other. I hadn'

Re: have you rebooted a Ford lately ?

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:32:07PM -0500, Mike Marchywka wrote: >I like to post these things on this list because everyone is aware of >the tradeoffs and issues in OS choice. I think we've been over this before. This really has nothing to do with Cygwin and is not appropriate here. Please confin

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygport-0.2.7-1

The following package has been updated in the Cygwin net release: *** cygport-0.2.7-1 cygport is a new, and increasingly popular[1], way to create Cygwin packages. You only need cygport if you're a package developer or building cygport-based Cygwin packages from source. New features in 0.2.7: