Re: tcflush waits

Having now looked at the source I feel it is like this by design but I don't understand why as there are no comments.If this is indeed a best approximation to the intended behaviour should it be documented as such ? Jon On 28 Jul 2003 at 14:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have an app that opens

Launching cygwin with tcsh

Hello i wanted to know how could i launch tcsh-shell instead of bash-shell when i run cygwin ... If i run tcsh-shell, is there any possibility to create a .tcshrc for configuring path and other environment variables? ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- U

Re: upgrade question

Thank you for this. However, I managed to find a disaster in there despite everything. :o( I renamed the whole e:\cygwin tree to e:\old_cygwin. I had to rerun the install several times, for reasons I need not go into. Eventually it got to the end and said "I found an old cygwin, shall I del

Re: upgrade question

Rob Clack wrote: > Thank you for this. However, I managed to find a disaster in there > despite everything. :o( > > I renamed the whole e:\cygwin tree to e:\old_cygwin. I had to rerun the > install several times, for reasons I need not go into. Eventually it > got to the end and said "I found a

Re: upgrade question

On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 20:22, Max Bowsher wrote: > Rob Clack wrote: > > Thank you for this. However, I managed to find a disaster in there > > despite everything. :o( > > > > I renamed the whole e:\cygwin tree to e:\old_cygwin. I had to rerun the > > install several times, for reasons I need not

profile folder missing in docbook-xsl package

Hi Marcel, the profile folder is missing in the latest docbook-xsl-1.61.3-1 package, breaking the various profile stylesheets :o( Did you drop the folder intentionally from the distribution or was it a mere oversight? Patrick -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

RE: Local printer access question..

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Igor Pechtchanski > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Rick Rankin wrote: > > > --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto

RE: Launching cygwin with tcsh

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of philippe guillaume > Hello i wanted to know how could i launch tcsh-shell > instead of bash-shell when i run cygwin ... Change C:\cygwin\cygwin.bat (assuming default install path) to your fulfill your needs. > If i run tcsh-shell,

Re: profile folder missing in docbook-xsl package

Hi Patrick. On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:01:06PM +0200, Patrick Eisenacher wrote: > the profile folder is missing in the latest docbook-xsl-1.61.3-1 > package, breaking the various profile stylesheets :o( I've repackaged docbook-xsl with 'profiling' directory included. The new version (1.61.3-2) s

Re: Source code for binaries offered at http://thinstall.com/ ?

My concern is that issues surrounding Mr. Clark's use of cygwin goes well beyond just supplying source on his website. It appears that the raison d'etre for his software is to simplfy software distribution, and "can up" processes and process combinations for very tailored purposes - a worthwhile e

And now a problem with tcl

I've been searching for a long time about this problem. The command runs normally on Unix but not on Cygwin :( The problem concerns a command button which runs a sh-script ... Here is the syntax : button .frPrincipal.thug\ -activebackground "#beccbe" \ -background "#d2e0d2" \

how to activate registry changes

Hi, I have the problem, that I change values in the registry to activate a screensaver. But after I wrot the new values into the registry nothing happend. I can see the new values in the registry. When I open the dialog in Windows the old values are still shown. How can I force windows to acce

Re: how to activate registry changes

On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:05:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I have the problem, that I change values in the registry to activate a screensaver. > But after I wrot the new values into the registry nothing happend. I can see the new > values in the registry. When I open the dialog

Re: how to activate registry changes

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I have the problem, that I change values in the registry to activate a screensaver. > But after I wrot the new values into the registry nothing happend. I can see the new > values in the registry. When I open the dialog in Windows the old v

And now a problem with tcl

I've been searching for a long time about this problem. The command runs normally on Unix but not on Cygwin :( The problem concerns a command button which runs a sh-script ... Here is the syntax : button .frPrincipal.thug\ -activebackground "#beccbe" \ -background "#d2e0d2" \

Re: DLL 1.3.22 - etags 5.5.4 fails on XP Pro:K@N@!:

"Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The solution which should have been much more obvious to me is to use ctags.exe with the '-e' option. I'm assuming etags is a link to ctags. Jeff >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf >> Of Igor Pechtchanski

Limit to size of pipe

Hello! Further to an earlier message I sent, I now attach an example. This tries to send a message of a fixed sized down a pipe. Under windows I can't seem to send much more than 25k down in one go, although I can send more if I chop it up into sections. Under linux however I can send as large

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2

I've updated the docbook-xsl package to version 1.61.3-2. docbook-xsl package contains XSL stylesheets for the DocBook XML DTD created by Norman Walsh and others. Changes since 1.61.3-1: - Added 'profiling' directory To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on the htt

Re: 1.5.1: lseek64 woes (was Re: 1.5.1: unzip problems with binary files in archive)

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:41:43PM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote: Content-Description: message body text >Charles Wilson writes: > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > I'm getting a strange error from unzip when trying to extract an > > archive that contains binary files. Everything work

Re: DLL 1.3.22 - etags 5.5.4 fails on XP Pro:K@N@!:

Exactly. That's why I mentioned using ctags directly in Doing so should remove the magic, mystery, and the problem. Larry Jeffery B. Rancier wrote: "Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The solution which should

Re: Limit to size of pipe

chris writes: > Hello! > > Further to an earlier message I sent, I now attach an example. This > tries to send a message of a fixed sized down a pipe. Under windows I > can't seem to send much more than 25k down in one go, although I can > send more if I chop it up into sections. Under li

Re: Limit to size of pipe

David Rothenberger wrote: chris writes: > Hello! > > Further to an earlier message I sent, I now attach an example. This > tries to send a message of a fixed sized down a pipe. Under windows I > can't seem to send much more than 25k down in one go, although I can > send more if I chop it up in

Re: And now a problem with tcl

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, philippe guillaume wrote: > I've been searching for a long time about this > problem. > The command runs normally on Unix but not on Cygwin :( > > The problem concerns a command button which runs a > sh-script ... > Here is the syntax : > > button .frPrincipal.thug\ >

Re: 1.5.1: lseek64 woes (was Re: 1.5.1: unzip problems with binary files in archive)

Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:41:43PM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote: > Content-Description: message body text > >Charles Wilson writes: > > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > > I'm getting a strange error from unzip when trying to extract an > > > archive th

Re: Limit to size of pipe

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, chris wrote: > David Rothenberger wrote: > > >chris writes: > > > Hello! > > > > > > Further to an earlier message I sent, I now attach an example. This > > > tries to send a message of a fixed sized down a pipe. Under windows I > > > can't seem to send much more than 25k down

Re: gdb & g++ (de)mangling

> * In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * On the subject of "Re: gdb & g++ (de)mangling" > * Sent on Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:22:49 -0400 > * Honorable Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 06:28:28PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: > >does cygwin/gdb/g++ demangling work? >

RE: Source code for binaries offered at http://thinstall.com/unix_tools ?

I will write up some documentation soon about the GPL issue, but a quick clarification: 1. Some emails have mentioned unix_tools as being commercial and that I have customers who "purchased" it. unix_tools is free (as in beer), always has been, always will be - it is something I made to be a hand

RE: Local printer access question..

--- "Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of Igor Pechtchanski > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Rick Rankin wrote: > > > > > --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Hannu E

Re: 1.5.1: unzip problems with binary files in archive

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:14:53PM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote: >This problem occurs with the 1.5.1 DLL and the latest test packages >for zip and unzip. Everything works fine with 1.3.22. It also >works okay with 1.5.1 and the Curr versions of zip/unzip. Btw, I was able to reproduce this aft

RE: Local printer access question..

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Rick Rankin wrote: > --- "Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski > > > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Rick Rankin wrote: > > > > > > > --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: gcj file input problem, "available" incorrect

Wrong list, redirecting. Please use the list for all further discussion. Igor On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Jørgen Nørgaard wrote: > Hi, > > while using the gcj component of gcc (java compiler frontemd for gcc) > we have found a peculiar problem with FileInputStreams on Windows > (XP). > > > Giv

RE: Source code for binaries offered at http://thinstall.com/unix_tools ?

As long as the *complete* binary contents can be extracted then I would essentially agree that Thininstall is fundamentally no different than an ordinary zip archive. No one has implied to my knowledge - especially me - that you were *actually* "selling" unix_tools - but that there certainly would

Re: Source code for binaries offered at http://thinstall.com/unix_tools?

Jonathan Clark wrote: > I will write up some documentation soon about the GPL issue, but a quick > clarification: > > 1. unix_tools is free (as in beer) [...] I realize the fact that > unix_tools is free does not change any GPL issues, [...] > > 2. Thinstall does not modify the binary structu

RE: Local printer access question..

--- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Rick Rankin wrote: > > > --- "Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Igor Pechtchanski > > > > > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Rick R

Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file

I am having a problem with trying to sort a pipe-delimited file using the cygwin sort command from a dos batch file. If I enter the command in cygwin environment, it works fine: sort -t \| -k 3 -k 11 -k 12 -o sortedfile.txt unsortedfile.txt But I have problems running it from a dos batch fi

cygwin.com unavailable from blueyonder/telewest uk

I'm fresh to this list so please excuse if this is a common kind of question. I can't get to cygwin.com from my home PC. I wondered if this is because of problems with my telewest/blueyonder ISP; looking at the site from another ISP I don't see any problems. Whatever: My question is: can I inst

Re: cygwin.com unavailable from blueyonder/telewest uk

On 29 Jul 2003, Matt Fairtlough wrote: > I'm fresh to this list so please excuse if this is a common kind of > question. > > I can't get to cygwin.com from my home PC. I wondered if this is > because of problems with my telewest/blueyonder ISP; looking at the site > from another ISP I don't see

RE: Local printer access question..

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Igor Pechtchanski > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 7:16 PM > > > Was my writing unclear? > > No, no, it was my late night reading... Ahh... glad to hear that ;-) > > > > Also, try setting up a dummy print

RE: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file

I guess I found the answer to my own question. Since some other people have had this same problem, here is the solution. There is a problem with the PATH environment under Win 2000. To identify the problem I typed the following in DOS: bash -c "which sort" I got a response of "/cygdrive

Additional Info on undefined reference to `_WinMain@16'

Sorry if this info seems a bit too basic, but I spent several hours last night trying to resolve a linking error while compiling with gcc on Cygwin. G++ version 3.2 20020927 (prerelease) Cygwin Net Release 2.340.2.5 installed via the net 2 weeks ago. Being new to namespaces, I thought it made sen

RE: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Lisbeth Kellogg wrote: > I guess I found the answer to my own question. Since some other people > have had this same problem, here is the solution. > > There is a problem with the PATH environment under Win 2000. To > identify the problem I typed the following in DOS: >

RE: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file

Yes, that would fix it. But I think we have a bug here. In cygwin I get: $ echo $PATH /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/cygdrive/c/WINNT/system32:/cygdrive/c/WINN T:/cygdr ive/c/WINNT/System32/Wbem:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SQL Server/80/Tool s/BINN:/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~1/ULTRAE~1:/usr/bin:/

RE: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file

My /etc/profile (the default one with cygwin) contains this: export PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:$PATH" which implies that the behavior you are seeing is to be expected (if you have the same /etc/profile). See what happens when I add the '--logon' postfix to 'bash'. Microsoft Windows 2000 [

RE: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file

Yes. Now I get the same thing. But why don't I have to do it that way in XP? --- Lisbeth Kellogg Office: 651-675-2610 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DePriest, Jason R. Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 4:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

gcj-3.3 with Cygwin?

Hallo, I'm getting: $ ./rmic.exe --help Aborted (core dumped) $ ./rmiregistry.exe --help Aborted (core dumped) $ ./jv-convert.exe --help Aborted (core dumped) This is a fresh build of gcc-3.3, no patches besides updating boehm-gc to version 6.2 and configured with: ${gccsrc}/configure \

Re: apache problems gone with 1.50

Bill McCormick wrote: I installed cygwin 1.50 and my apache problems have ceased. This is good to hear. Perhaps I will switch from Apache for Windows -> Apache under Cygwin. Only problem is I also trying to move my web site over to a Linux box instead - which makes this all kinda moot. However I

Re: apache problems gone with 1.50

> This is good to hear. Perhaps I will switch from Apache for Windows -> > Apache under Cygwin. Only problem is I also trying to move my web site > over to a Linux box instead - which makes this all kinda moot. However I > do have a friend who wishes to host his web site on a Windows box and I > am

Re: 1.5.1: lseek64 woes (was Re: 1.5.1: unzip problems with binaryfiles in archive)

David Rothenberger wrote: --- unzip-5.50/unzpriv.h2003-07-29 09:10:41.325502400 -0700 +++ unzip-5.50-fixed/unzpriv.h 2003-07-29 09:08:48.783675200 -0700 @@ -200,6 +200,10 @@ typedef unsigned int extent; #endif /* ?MODERN */ +#ifdef __CYGWIN__ +# include +#endif + #ifndef MINIX

Who's who of packagers?

Re: Available for test: cygwin-1.5.1-1 On 28 Jul, Christopher Faylor wrote: > If you are maintaining a cygwin package, then you should be subscribed > to the cygwin-apps mailing list, and you should be following the > discussions there about rebuilding for the cygwin 1.5.x series. If you >

Re: Who's who of packagers?

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Re: Available for test: cygwin-1.5.1-1 > On 28 Jul, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > If you are maintaining a cygwin package, then you should be subscribed > > to the cygwin-apps mailing list, and you should be following the > > discussions there ab

Re: Who's who of packagers?

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:40:14AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >How does one check who the maintainer of a package is; e.g. to make >sure it is not oneself? What an odd question. If you don't know if you are a cygwin package maintainer then you can take it as a strong given that you are not

Re: Who's who of packagers?

On 30 Jul, Elfyn McBratney replied to: > > How does one check who the maintainer of a package is; e.g. to make > > sure it is not oneself? > > One doesn't. Fine. [WM stuff] > Well, it's not you. :-) Unless you have taken over the reigns from > Harold. No, no, no! :-) luke -- Unsubscrib

RE: apache problems gone with 1.50

> Bill McCormick wrote: > > > I installed cygwin 1.50 and my apache problems have ceased. Andrew Wrote: > This is good to hear. Perhaps I will switch from Apache for Windows -> > Apache under Cygwin. Only problem is I also trying to move my web site > over to a Linux box instead - which makes thi

RE: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file

Umm, actually, they should. The default /etc/profile prepends "/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin" to the PATH, and it's only executed when bash gets a --login flag. Igor On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Lisbeth Kellogg wrote: > Yes, that would fix it. But I think we have a bug here. In cygwin I > get:

RE: Local printer access question..

--- "Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of Igor Pechtchanski > > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 7:16 PM > > > > > Was my writing unclear? > > > > No, no, it was my late night