Re: wget seems to have lost executive capacity

2016-09-16 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-09-16 13:05, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: Am 16.09.2016 um 15:21 schrieb Fergus: ~> ls -al /bin/wget* -rwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator None 514589 Jul 11 18:10 wget.exe* If the size is right, correct for cygwin32, date/time correct for UTC+1 - BST? better check is: $ sha512sum /bin/wget fc

Re: wget seems to have lost executive capacity

2016-09-16 Thread Hans-Bernhard Bröker
Am 16.09.2016 um 15:21 schrieb Fergus: ~> ls -al /bin/wget* -rwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator None 514589 Jul 11 18:10 wget.exe* If the size is right, Actually, it's _not_ right. That size is off by about 25 KiB from the released binary package I have, which is from Cygwin package wget-1.18-1: -

RE: wget seems to have lost executive capacity

2016-09-16 Thread Fergus
Thanks very much for advice. I got ~> strace wget --- Process 1216 created --- Process 1216 loaded C:\Windows\System32\ntdll.dll at 7721 --- Process 1216 loaded C:\Windows\System32\kernel32.dll at 7699 --- Process 1216 loaded C:\Windows\System32\KernelBase.dll at 7540 --- Process 1216

Re: wget seems to have lost executive capacity

2016-09-16 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 16/09/2016 15:21, Fergus wrote: Just noticed (this has occurred since Tuesday, I think, but I can think of no associated Cygwin update or any other local event): Tuesday is the usual day for MS updates .. all scripts involving a wget command line move on to the next line as though it had b

wget seems to have lost executive capacity

2016-09-16 Thread Fergus
Just noticed (this has occurred since Tuesday, I think, but I can think of no associated Cygwin update or any other local event): all scripts involving a wget command line move on to the next line as though it had been simply a comment of no executive status. Examples (showing other execs under /