Edward Lam wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>
>>> 2. Use 'cygpath' to convert from DOS to Cygwin path forms and back as
>>> needed. This can get tricky/cumbersome in some cases.
>>
>> It can be a lot easier if you have a Makefile-based build system, where
>> you can
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 03:10:19PM -0400, Edward Lam wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
2. Use 'cygpath' to convert from DOS to Cygwin path forms and back as
needed. This can get tricky/cumbersome in some cases.
It can be a lot easier if yo
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 03:10:19PM -0400, Edward Lam wrote:
>Dave Korn wrote:
>> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>
>>> 2. Use 'cygpath' to convert from DOS to Cygwin path forms and back as
>>> needed. This can get tricky/cumbersome in some cases.
>>
>> It can be a lot easier if you have a M
Dave Korn wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
2. Use 'cygpath' to convert from DOS to Cygwin path forms and back as
needed. This can get tricky/cumbersome in some cases.
It can be a lot easier if you have a Makefile-based build system, where you
can do the conversion on things that yo
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> 2. Use 'cygpath' to convert from DOS to Cygwin path forms and back as
> needed. This can get tricky/cumbersome in some cases.
It can be a lot easier if you have a Makefile-based build system, where you
can do the conversion on things that you know need conve
Vincent R. wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:38:10 +0200, "Vincent R."
wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:15:18 +0200, "Vincent R."
wrote:
Hi,
I know that my question could be a bit astonishing but I am not afraid
to
ask it ;-)
I am trying to compile a software for symbian platform and originally
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:38:10 +0200, "Vincent R."
wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:15:18 +0200, "Vincent R."
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know that my question could be a bit astonishing but I am not afraid
to
>> ask it ;-)
>> I am trying to compile a software for symbian platform and originally
> they
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:15:18 +0200, "Vincent R."
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that my question could be a bit astonishing but I am not afraid to
> ask it ;-)
> I am trying to compile a software for symbian platform and originally
they
> have released a SDK on windows
> linked with mingw and where you
Hi,
I know that my question could be a bit astonishing but I am not afraid to
ask it ;-)
I am trying to compile a software for symbian platform and originally they
have released a SDK on windows
linked with mingw and where you use a DOS terminal to compile.
They have designed some build system mi
from - I'm hoping someone can tell me whether the
presence of those harmful -L/usr/local/lib options is a packaging bug,
an upstream bug, or a weird feature.
It is a default option. I see that this is not the best for
maintainers. As a workaround you may patch your perlld wrapper.
ul -L/usr/local/lib options is a packaging bug, an upstream bug,
or a weird feature.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
11 matches
Mail list logo
