Re: w32api usr/include/sqlext.h bad macros

2004-12-08 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:40:59PM -0500, Eric Sharkey wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:41:02PM -0500, Eric Sharkey wrote: > > >The following was rejected on cygwin-patches. I'm intentionally posting > > >to the wrong list now because I shouldn't have to subscribe to a mailing > > >list just

Re: w32api usr/include/sqlext.h bad macros

2004-12-06 Thread Eric Sharkey
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:41:02PM -0500, Eric Sharkey wrote: > >The following was rejected on cygwin-patches. I'm intentionally posting > >to the wrong list now because I shouldn't have to subscribe to a mailing > >list just to report a bug! > > Since cygwin-patches isn't a "bug reporting" mai

Re: w32api usr/include/sqlext.h bad macros

2004-12-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:41:02PM -0500, Eric Sharkey wrote: >The following was rejected on cygwin-patches. I'm intentionally posting >to the wrong list now because I shouldn't have to subscribe to a mailing >list just to report a bug! Since cygwin-patches isn't a "bug reporting" mailing list an

w32api usr/include/sqlext.h bad macros

2004-12-06 Thread Eric Sharkey
piracy: There is no conspiracy Subject: w32api usr/include/sqlext.h bad macros Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:30:29 -0500 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The interval code macros in sqlext.h are pretty screwed up. It currently reads: #define SQL_INTERVAL_YEAR (100 + SQL_CODE_SECOND) #define SQL_INT