Re: vim-minimal annoyance

2013-06-18 Thread Frank Fesevur
2013/6/18 Csaba Raduly: >> If I have the full-featured vim installed, then I expect vi == >> full_featured_vim. This is how it has always been. >> >> I guess I'll just have to resign myself to creating an alias (vi=vim) on >> every install... > > Maybe there should be a "vi-as-vim" package which co

Re: vim-minimal annoyance

2013-06-18 Thread Csaba Raduly
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Shaun Fielder wrote: >> As Larry stated, the latest release of vim-minimal uses virc instead of > vimrc (as done on Fedora), so this should no longer be an issue. > > Sure, now if I upgrade an existing installation and then type 'vi' - I won't > see any errors. Gre

RE: vim-minimal annoyance

2013-06-17 Thread Shaun Fielder
> As Larry stated, the latest release of vim-minimal uses virc instead of vimrc (as done on Fedora), so this should no longer be an issue. Sure, now if I upgrade an existing installation and then type 'vi' - I won't see any errors. Great. However, I'll be left wondering why it isn't working like I

Re: vim-minimal annoyance

2013-06-17 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-06-16 21:54, Shaun Fielder wrote: Since the vim-minimal package came into existence, it's caused a fair bit of mucking around and frustration here (broken .vimrc; time to figure out what's going on). (Especially as each update wants to re-install vim-minimal which we don't want.) As Lar

Re: vim-minimal annoyance

2013-06-17 Thread Frank Fesevur
2013/6/17 Shaun Fielder: > We're so used to vi === vim [fully featured] on Cygwin. At the very least - > when the full "vim" package is installed 'vi' should use it. > At the moment, I'm having to get everyone here to uninstall vim-minimal and > manually setup a sym-link (or alias) to get back to t

Re: vim-minimal annoyance

2013-06-16 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/16/2013 10:54 PM, Shaun Fielder wrote: Since the vim-minimal package came into existence, it's caused a fair bit of mucking around and frustration here (broken .vimrc; time to figure out what's going on). (Especially as each update wants to re-install vim-minimal which we don't want.) The

vim-minimal annoyance

2013-06-16 Thread Shaun Fielder
Since the vim-minimal package came into existence, it's caused a fair bit of mucking around and frustration here (broken .vimrc; time to figure out what's going on). (Especially as each update wants to re-install vim-minimal which we don't want.) We're so used to vi === vim [fully featured] on Cyg