Re: tail -f problem

2003-01-31 Thread Matthew Smith
th [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:39 AM > To: Cygwin > Cc: Scott Alexander > Subject: Re: tail -f problem > > > This is not the fault of tail, rather IIS. Search the archives if you're > interested why. > > cheers, > -Matt

RE: tail -f problem

2003-01-31 Thread Scott Alexander
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:39 AM To: Cygwin Cc: Scott Alexander Subject: Re: tail -f problem This is not the fault of tail, rather IIS. Search the archives if you're interested why. cheers, -Matt Smith > With cygwin's tail, the output is not quite the

Re: tail -f problem

2003-01-31 Thread Matthew Smith
This is not the fault of tail, rather IIS. Search the archives if you're interested why. cheers, -Matt Smith > With cygwin's tail, the output is not quite the same as the linux version of > tail. With Cygwin's version, I will get output with tail -f, but the > updates aren't "realtime" as the

tail -f problem

2003-01-31 Thread Scott Alexander
All, This is my first post to this list, so please excuse missing information that is normally seen in a possible problem with cygwin. Here goes... In my career, I'm a software consultant, doing QA on a web client/server application. Part of my investigation of issues is looking at the realtime