On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:09:29AM -0600, Chris Polley wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:20:19 -0500, you wrote:
>>On Wed, Mar 27, 2002@02:20:35PM -0600, Polley Christopher W wrote:
>>>Are there more complete instructions to strace besides --help, the
>>>Cygwin user guide, or winsup/utils/utils.sgml
At 02:09 AM 3/28/2002, Chris Polley wrote:
>Well, inetd is running from the system account (18). The user account
>I was using to run strace has local (machine) administrator privileges
>(i.e. is in the machine's "Administrators" group.) Is this
>sufficiently privileged?
No. Look at inetutil
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:20:19 -0500, you wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 27, 2002@02:20:35PM -0600, Polley Christopher W wrote:
>>Are there more complete instructions to strace besides --help, the Cygwin
>>user guide, or winsup/utils/utils.sgml (all essentially the same thing)?
>
>If we had better documentati
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:32 PM
> > If we had better documentation why would it be hidden?
>
> I'm sure Cygwin tries to include the best possible
> documentation. But if someone can't find an answer in the
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:20:35PM -0600, Polley Christopher W wrote:
> >Are there more complete instructions to strace besides --help, the Cygwin
> >user guide, or winsup/utils/utils.sgml (al
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:20:35PM -0600, Polley Christopher W wrote:
>Are there more complete instructions to strace besides --help, the Cygwin
>user guide, or winsup/utils/utils.sgml (all essentially the same thing)?
If we had better documentation why would it be hidden?
The best documentation
6 matches
Mail list logo
