Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Max, any new insights here?
Still waiting for some that elusive quantity "free time" :-)
I've been reproducing the failiure inside the rsync testsuite, and its
turned out to be less than trivial to graft strace into it.
I might try extracting one of the tests from the t
Max, any new insights here?
Corinna
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:16:33PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:15:52PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > > I'm seeing rsync failiures due to socketpair(AF_UNIX, SO
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:15:52PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > I'm seeing rsync failiures due to socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, fd)
> > failing with errno 112, Address already in use.
> >
> > As far as I know, this shouldn'
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:15:52PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
> I'm seeing rsync failiures due to socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, fd)
> failing with errno 112, Address already in use.
>
> As far as I know, this shouldn't be able to occur. This seems to me like a
> Cygwin bug? If it is, then thi
I'm seeing rsync failiures due to socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, fd)
failing with errno 112, Address already in use.
As far as I know, this shouldn't be able to occur. This seems to me like a
Cygwin bug? If it is, then this is a bug report.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.co
5 matches
Mail list logo