Re: sha512.sum not on mirrors

2017-10-07 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2017-10-07 12:07, Achim Gratz wrote: > Brian Inglis writes: >> Just checking, suspect it is an error, but Cygwin setup does not care, so it >> could be a process change. > > The chain of trust for setup is via the signature on the setup.ini file > it uses and the SHA512 digests contained therei

Re: sha512.sum not on mirrors

2017-10-07 Thread Achim Gratz
Brian Inglis writes: > Just checking, suspect it is an error, but Cygwin setup does not care, so it > could be a process change. The chain of trust for setup is via the signature on the setup.ini file it uses and the SHA512 digests contained therein for each file that setup might install. I don't

Re: sha512.sum not on mirrors

2017-10-07 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2017-10-07 11:28, Steven Penny wrote: > On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 11:02:35, Brian Inglis wrote: >> Mirrors I have checked are missing x86{,_64}/sha512.sum. >> Is this no longer generated and uploaded to verify setup files are >> consistent? > > Nope, wrong: >    $ curl -I cygwin.mirror.constant.com/x

Re: sha512.sum not on mirrors

2017-10-07 Thread Steven Penny
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 11:02:35, Brian Inglis wrote: Mirrors I have checked are missing x86{,_64}/sha512.sum. Is this no longer generated and uploaded to verify setup files are consistent? Nope, wrong: $ curl -I cygwin.mirror.constant.com/x86_64/sha512.sum HTTP/1.1 200 OK $ curl -I cygwi

sha512.sum not on mirrors

2017-10-07 Thread Brian Inglis
Hi folks, Mirrors I have checked are missing x86{,_64}/sha512.sum. Is this no longer generated and uploaded to verify setup files are consistent? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://