>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>There is no "su" command in the cygwin release.
>>
>>This mailing list is intended for discussing cygwin packaging issues
>>(and secondarily it is apparently intended for me to tell ever other
>>poster that they are off-topic).
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 02:29:53PM -0500
Ah -- but "su" is *supposed* to be part of the "sh-utils" package -- but
it was ripped out because it doesn't (yet) work on cygwin. I'd view
this post as a "here's a patch for the sh-utils package". Which,
incidentally, DOES belong on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list -- but not on
the [EMAIL PROTE
2 matches
Mail list logo
