On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:09:31AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Either it's the new setup.exe v.2.194.2.24, or some glitch in the current
>associated setup.ini (setup-timestamp: 1018593006), but every visit to
>http://cygwin.com/setup.exe now results in a new installation of
>tetex-beta-200012
Yes: I think it must be inconsistencies in the version numbering that have
caused this. I found a recent setup.ini and compared it with the current
version:
Comparing files setup.ini and setup.old
** setup.ini
setup-timestamp: 1018593006
setup-version: 2.194.2.24
** setup.old
setup-times
I know you (Robert) have not got a W98 machine. I've tried as much
investigation at this end as I can. I've tried all combinations of v.22 /
v.24 here, with / without using setup.ini at all, and editing setup.ini when
used to refer to v.22 / v.24 accordingly. There is nothing obvious that I
can se
Thanks for speedy response. Sorry for delay: it took ages to download
tetex-beta again.
The machines (two: identical repeated behaviour on both) are W98/SE.
I use ftp://mirrors.rcn.net/ (tried others; none that I tried had yet been
renewed).
Here is setup.log
2002/04/12 08:15:39 Starting cygwi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 5:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4
>
>
> Either it's the new setup.
Either it's the new setup.exe v.2.194.2.24, or some glitch in the current
associated setup.ini (setup-timestamp: 1018593006), but every visit to
http://cygwin.com/setup.exe now results in a new installation of
tetex-beta-20001218-4. Fergus
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscr
6 matches
Mail list logo
