Re: rxvt problems on win98

2002-01-24 Thread Charles Wilson
I use the 'run' program from http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutls/unversioned/run/ Just grab the run.exe program, rename it to 'runrxvt.exe' and drop it into /bin. Then, set your shortcut to point to runrxvt instead of run. Voila' ! no more flash. --Chuck Scott Evans wrote: >

Re: rxvt problems on win98

2002-01-24 Thread Scott Evans
> Why is the brief flash a problem? It's not a real problem -- just an annoyance. Given the choice, I'd rather not have it. scott -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/doc

Re: rxvt problems on win98

2002-01-24 Thread David Starks-Browning
On Thursday 24 Jan 02, Scott Evans writes: > I may have missed this discussino, but has anyone considered using the > no-console build of rxvt in the distro? Why is the brief flash a problem? David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http:/

Re: rxvt problems on win98

2002-01-24 Thread Scott Evans
Okay, I just did an update on all my packages and specified "reinstall" for rxvt, just to be safe. The behavior no longer exists, so that's good. However, I now remember why I was using an older version of rxvt: the one that is distributed with Cygwin is the "with a console" version (note the win

rxvt problems on win98

2002-01-24 Thread David Starks-Browning
On Thursday 24 Jan 02, Scott Evans writes: > The rxvt I have reports v2.7.2: > -rwxr-xr-x1 gse 544141824 Mar 20 2001 /usr/bin/rxvt Mine says: > -rwxr-xr-x1 starksb None 142848 Jun 4 2001 /usr/bin/rxvt What does "cygcheck -c" say? Have you tried using Cygwin Setu

rxvt problems on win98

2002-01-24 Thread Scott Evans
I have Cygwin installed on two Win98 machines -- identical installs. I've used rxvt as my shell window since I found out about the port (well before it was included in the distro). However, on one of my machines, when I resize the rxvt window, bash pegs the CPU and stops responding. This doesn't