Original Message
>From: Jason Tishler
>Sent: 15 July 2005 22:00
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:21:11PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Reading the .gz files will probably be the worst bit of it!
>
> Actually, the above was much easier than I thought.
> #include
> gzFile file
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:18:26AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:27:27AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >So, it sounds like we have short and long term plans. Now, I just
> >have to work 'em.
>
> Is it done yet?
Yes.
> Is it done yet?
Yes.
> Is it done yet?
Yes
Jason Tishler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:21:11PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
Original Message
From: Jason Tishler
Sent: 15 July 2005 12:27
Exactly! Right after my previous post, I started to investigate
enhancing rebase to support rebaseall functionality. I quickly
realized t
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:21:11PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Original Message
> >From: Jason Tishler
> >Sent: 15 July 2005 12:27
>
> > Exactly! Right after my previous post, I started to investigate
> > enhancing rebase to support rebaseall functionality. I quickly
> > realized that this
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:27:27AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>So, it sounds like we have short and long term plans. Now, I just have
>to work 'em.
Is it done yet?
Is it done yet?
Is it done yet?
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: ht
Original Message
>From: Jason Tishler
>Sent: 15 July 2005 12:27
> Exactly! Right after my previous post, I started to investigate
> enhancing rebase to support rebaseall functionality. I quickly realized
> that this change would not require too much effort.
Reading the .gz files will
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:01:08PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:55:52AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:50:08PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> OTOH, writing a mingw C program to do what rebaseall does wouldn't
> >> be *that* hard.
>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:55:52AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:08:33PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> >My inclination is to convert rebaseall to an ash script.
>>
>> Once again, let me point out -- t
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:12:19PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Original Message
>>From: Jason Tishler
>>Sent: 14 July 2005 12:56
>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:08:33PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
My inclination is to
Original Message
>From: Gerrit P. Haase
>Sent: 14 July 2005 16:58
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
> I was also wondering whether really it shouldn't be part of setup.exe
> I'm all against including it into the setup step. [ ...] so I
> don't think it should be a default step when setting up Cygwi
Original Message
>From: Dave Korn
>Sent: 14 July 2005 16:29
> I was also wondering
> whether really it shouldn't be part of setup.exe
[thinking out loud]
D'oh, no, that's silly. It should be part of rebase.exe; might as well
just patch the rebaseall script functionality right into
Dave Korn wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:50:08PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
OTOH, writing a mingw C program to do what rebaseall does wouldn't be
*that* hard.
Agreed.
Once again, let me point out -- that will not solve the problem. You
won't be able to run the mingw executable
Original Message
>From: Gerrit P. Haase
>Sent: 14 July 2005 16:00
> Dave Korn wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:50:08PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
OTOH, writing a mingw C program to do what rebaseall does wouldn't be
*that* hard.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>
>> Once again
Dave Korn wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:50:08PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
OTOH, writing a mingw C program to do what rebaseall does wouldn't be
*that* hard.
Agreed.
Once again, let me point out -- that will not solve the problem. You
won't be able to run the mingw executable
Original Message
>From: Jason Tishler
>Sent: 14 July 2005 12:56
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:08:33PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>>> My inclination is to convert rebaseall to an ash script.
>>
>> Once again, let me poi
Dave Korn wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why isn't "exec /bin/sh.exe rebaseall" the solution to
> this problem?
It would, presuming you meant /bin/ash.exe and the user hadn't removed
the ash package. It would help if the rebaseall shebang was #!/bin/ash,
then you could type "exec rebaseall".
I su
Original Message
>From: Jason Tishler
>Sent: 14 July 2005 12:56
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:08:33PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>>> My inclination is to convert rebaseall to an ash script.
>>
>> Once again, let me poi
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:08:33PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >My inclination is to convert rebaseall to an ash script.
>
> Once again, let me point out -- that will not solve the problem. You
> won't be able to run the scri
18 matches
Mail list logo
