Yep - that info ended up in the bit bucket... Sorry.
--Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:57 AM
I know the above. What I was trying to determine is what binutils
version you had installed when you built your curl-
Kevin,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:39:17AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> although I'm pretty sure when I prepared those three sample
> DLLs to mail to you, I had the latest on my machine...
I know the above. What I was trying to determine is what binutils
version you had installed when you buil
y, January 15, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Roth, Kevin P.
Cc: Cygwin
Subject: Re: rebase for setup (curl)
Kevin,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:22:09PM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> Don't have any idea at all why it didn't work before but now it does.
Are your sure that you weren't using an
Kevin,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:22:09PM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> Don't have any idea at all why it didn't work before but now it does.
Are your sure that you weren't using an old binutils when you built the
non-rebase-able curl DLL? I just checked my setup.log and I was using
binutils 2
One more follow-up:
I'm not sure what I did, however I tried it while logged in as an
administrative user on my Win2K box (where all this started). It built
re-basable.
So, I tried again while logged in as a non-admin (same test as I ran
nearer the start of this thread). But this time, it builds
On 8 Jan 2002, at 13:26, Jason Tishler wrote:
> All of the above appear to be non-relocatable:
> $ file *.dll
> cygcurl-2.dll: MS Windows PE Intel 80386 console DLL not relocatable
>
> How did you manage to accomplish this?
Well, I'm no closer to understanding why it didn't work on my Win
Kevin,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:22:06PM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:26 PM
>
> > Kevin,
> > Please keep your replies on-list...
>
> Normally I would, however I know attachments to
Gerrit,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:13:42PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> That is funny, with my browser (IE) get just binary garbage:
>
> BZh91AY&SYCF#=Uÿà
õxù¯4¦½¸ô÷ö>ûï >$什¼
>júzí)
> ...
Sorry, I have no control over your browser and this web serv
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:26 PM
> Kevin,
> Please keep your replies on-list...
Normally I would, however I know attachments to lists are often not well
liked, so I only sent them to you directly. Perhaps next time
Hallo Jason,
Am 2002-01-08 um 19:26 schriebst du:
> It is very simple. Just download, uncompress, and install the following:
> http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/rebase/rebase.exe.bz2
> into /usr/local/bin.
That is funny, with my browser (IE) get just binary garbage:
BZh91AY&SYCF#=U
Kevin,
Please keep your replies on-list...
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:08:09AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> gcc 2.95.3-5
> binutils 20011002-1
So you are using the latest too.
> Attached are three DLLs in a tar/bz2 file. They are as follows:
>
> cygcurl-2-build.dll : rebuilt last Friday, fr
Rob,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 09:42:57AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I decided to table the search for the "offending" ld option(s) because
> > of the following gloomy thought:
> >
> > Given that rebase can break c
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:47:32AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> > Negative - I get no warnings at all during the building of
> > cygcurl-2.dll.
>
> Thanks for the confirmation.
> All PostgreSQL DLLs are created with dll
===
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Vine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jason Tishler'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Cygwin'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Roth, Kevin P.'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sa
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:02:01PM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
> Jason Tishler writes:
> >Does anyone have any bright ideas?
>
> What happens if you link with --enable-auto-image-base ??
I was unable to get dllwrap to use --enable-auto-image-base, but I was
able to build pq.dll using the normal
Jason Tishler writes:
>>
>So, the options passed to ld are the same for cygcurl-2.dll and pq.dll
>except for the slight variation of --base-file versus --image-base.
>
>I decided to table the search for the "offending" ld option(s) because
>of the following gloomy thought:
>
>Given that rebase
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:47:32AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> Negative - I get no warnings at all during the building of
> cygcurl-2.dll.
Thanks for the confirmation.
> Here's the gcc line that actually dumps out the dll:
>
> $ gcc -Wl,--base-file,.libs/cygcurl-2.dll-base -Wl,--dll -nostar
Negative - I get no warnings at all during the building of
cygcurl-2.dll.
Here's the gcc line that actually dumps out the dll:
$ gcc -Wl,--base-file,.libs/cygcurl-2.dll-base -Wl,--dll -nostartfiles
-Wl,-e,
__cygwin_dll_entry@12 -o .libs/cygcurl-2.dll file.lo timeval.lo
base64.lo host
ip.lo pro
Kevin,
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 10:11:48AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> > Determine why cygcurl-2.dll and possibly other DLLs do not
> > tolerate rebasing.
>
> I'm the curl maintainer.
>
> Fair warning - I'm probably not going to be much help here
> (as far as figuring out why it's not reloca
19 matches
Mail list logo