On 10/24/2013 11:33, Hardy Griech wrote:
On 24.10.2013 16:21, cygwin at kosowsky.org wrote:
:
2. Why is the start time Jan 1, 1970 (or in my case Dec 31 1969?) when
the process was only started today?
:
Timezone?
Yes. (time_t)0 is Jan 1 1970 *GMT*.
--
Problem reports: http://cygw
On 24.10.2013 16:21, cygwin at kosowsky.org wrote:
:
2. Why is the start time Jan 1, 1970 (or in my case Dec 31 1969?) when
the process was only started today?
:
Timezone?
H.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentat
> > As for the date issue, what you're seeing is the traditional UNIX/POSIX
> > start time (the number of seconds since Jan 1, 1970). It's nothing
strange.
[...]
> 2. Why is the start time Jan 1, 1970 (or in my case Dec 31 1969?) when
>the process was only started today?
You are looking at
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote at about 07:58:24 -0400 on Thursday, October 24, 2013:
> On 10/24/2013 6:03 AM, Anthony Geoghegan wrote:
> > I was intrigued by Jeff's post so I tried a couple of experiments of
> > my own and was able to duplicate the same behaviour - including the
> > bash process be
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 6:03 AM, Anthony Geoghegan wrote:
>>
>> I was intrigued by Jeff's post so I tried a couple of experiments of
>> my own and was able to duplicate the same behaviour - including the
>> bash process being shown as a Windows pr
On 10/24/2013 6:03 AM, Anthony Geoghegan wrote:
I was intrigued by Jeff's post so I tried a couple of experiments of
my own and was able to duplicate the same behaviour - including the
bash process being shown as a Windows process - on my Cygwin
installation. The only difference was that I was ge
I was intrigued by Jeff's post so I tried a couple of experiments of
my own and was able to duplicate the same behaviour - including the
bash process being shown as a Windows process - on my Cygwin
installation. The only difference was that I was getting Jan 1 instead
of Dec 31 for the STIME.
FWIW
Corinna Vinschen wrote at about 10:25:35 +0200 on Wednesday, October 23, 2013:
> On Oct 21 18:09, cygwin wrote:
> > When I type 'ps', I get as expected the following processes:
> >
> > PIDPPIDPGID WINPID TTY UIDSTIME COMMAND
> > 180363188 18036 17792
On Oct 21 18:09, cygwin wrote:
> When I type 'ps', I get as expected the following processes:
>
> PIDPPIDPGID WINPID TTY UIDSTIME COMMAND
> 180363188 18036 17792 pty01001 16:54:33 /usr/bin/ps
> 318816883188 3212 pty01001 06:59
When I type 'ps', I get as expected the following processes:
PIDPPIDPGID WINPID TTY UIDSTIME COMMAND
180363188 18036 17792 pty01001 16:54:33 /usr/bin/ps
318816883188 3212 pty01001 06:59:16 /usr/bin/bash
1688 116
10 matches
Mail list logo
