jurriaan wrote:
> If not, where can I find the link to the mailing list archive that
> points out where the actual man-page for ps is kept?
> I downloaded 86 megabytes of source as per the FAQ, and found only
> 9 man-pages, and no ps.[0-9] amongst them.
The source for the 'ps' man page is in th
William Sutton wrote:
> I'll point out that there is also a significant difference between a
> direct response and gratuitous insults.
Then perhaps you shouldn't have responded to the direct response:
> Use "procps" rather than "ps".
with gratuitous insults:
> speaking for myself and a lot o
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:15:27PM -0400, William Sutton wrote:
> I'll point out that there is also a significant difference between a direct
> response and gratuitous insults.
I'll point out that there is a significant difference between an indignant
reply to an innocuous direct response and a..
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 09:27:59PM +0200, jurri...@rivierenland.xs4all.nl wrote:
>From: Christopher Faylor
>Date: Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:11:23PM -0400
>>
>> Languishing aside, however, if someone is willing to provide a patch to
>> provide a new option and new functionality, it will be given the
From: Christopher Faylor
Date: Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:11:23PM -0400
>
> Languishing aside, however, if someone is willing to provide a patch to
> provide a new option and new functionality, it will be given the same
> attention that we always give to patches.
>
something like this?
If not, wh
I'll point out that there is also a significant difference between a
direct response and gratuitous insults.
William Sutton
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:52:21PM +0200, jurri...@rivierenland.xs4all.nl wrote:
From: Mark J. Reed
Date: Wed, Apr 29, 20
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:52:21PM +0200, jurri...@rivierenland.xs4all.nl wrote:
>From: Mark J. Reed
>Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:31:13AM -0400
>>This has come up before; an archive search might save some repetition.
>
>Yes, sorry about that. I can understand that the output of ps is used
>in s
From: Mark J. Reed
Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:31:13AM -0400
>
> This has come up before; an archive search might save some repetition.
Yes, sorry about that. I can understand that the output of ps is used in
scripts. I find it harder to understand that adding a new flag to ps
would also break
William Sutton
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:13 AM, William Sutton
Let's try this one again, and maybe we can be civil instead of
condescending and insulting?
Ahh. You must be new here. :)
I've been using Cygwin for ~ 5 years and monitoring the list
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:13 AM, William Sutton
> Let's try this one again, and maybe we can be civil instead of
> condescending and insulting?
Ahh. You must be new here. :)
This has come up before; an archive search might save some repetition.
But if I understand the argument properly, it's
Let's try this one again, and maybe we can be civil instead of
condescending and insulting?
There are certain expectations of UNIX and UNIX-alike environments,
particularly core commands. When I move from Solaris to AIX to HP-UX to
Linux to Cygwin, I expect commands to perform in fairly simil
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:52:27AM -0400, William Sutton wrote:
>That's a nice answer for a command that works, but, speaking for myself
>and a lot of other people who use cygwin for the UNIX-like utilities
>(like the OP), we shouldn't have to remember one-off command names to
Maybe you and your m
That's a nice answer for a command that works, but, speaking for myself
and a lot of other people who use cygwin for the UNIX-like utilities (like
the OP), we shouldn't have to remember one-off command names to get the
same functionality we're used to in *NIX. Perhaps ps could be fixed to
incl
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:11:29AM +0200, jurriaan wrote:
>If I run execute some sh -c "sleep 180" & commands on cygwin
>(CYGWIN_NT-5.2 1.7.0(0.210/5/3) and then run ps -ef, I get a lot of
>
>/usr/bin/sh
>
>processes.
>
>If I run ps -ef on my linux (2.6.25.17), I get
>
>sh -c sleep 180
>sh -c slee
If I run execute some sh -c "sleep 180" & commands on cygwin
(CYGWIN_NT-5.2 1.7.0(0.210/5/3) and then run ps -ef, I get a lot of
/usr/bin/sh
processes.
If I run ps -ef on my linux (2.6.25.17), I get
sh -c sleep 180
sh -c sleep 180
sh -c sleep 180
Is there any way to get the commandline argume
15 matches
Mail list logo
