RE: procps and top output

2003-03-26 Thread Chris January
> Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > What options to procps are you using to get that output format? > I cannot > > reproduce it. > > It's the output of "top", and yes, I see the problem too. The "size" > column is always around 400 (+/-) MB, however large or small the process. > > The RSS size is corre

Re: procps and top output

2003-03-25 Thread Shankar Unni
Randall R Schulz wrote: What options to procps are you using to get that output format? I cannot reproduce it. It's the output of "top", and yes, I see the problem too. The "size" column is always around 400 (+/-) MB, however large or small the process. The RSS size is correct - it matches the

Re: procps and top output

2003-03-25 Thread Randall R Schulz
Jurgen, What options to procps are you using to get that output format? I cannot reproduce it. Randall Schulz At 23:44 2003-03-24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, Thanks for the nice procps package. However, are all values always shown as megabytes ? When top or procps are used, the size

procps and top output

2003-03-24 Thread jurgen . defurne
Dear all, Thanks for the nice procps package. However, are all values always shown as megabytes ? When top or procps are used, the size on top, vsz on procps report extremely large, like this : 08:43:41 up 6 days, 19:52, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 29 processes: 28 sleeping, 1 ru