On 04/09/2010 05:06, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 7/29/2010 4:20 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 7/28/2010 2:24 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
I have a tinderbox which does daily builds of the X.Org stack for
cygwin, and I've come across a something I don't understand with the way
libtool is working when build
On 7/29/2010 4:20 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 7/28/2010 2:24 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>
>> I have a tinderbox which does daily builds of the X.Org stack for
>> cygwin, and I've come across a something I don't understand with the way
>> libtool is working when building the pixman library, and I hop
On 29/07/2010 09:20, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 7/28/2010 2:24 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
I have a tinderbox which does daily builds of the X.Org stack for
cygwin, and I've come across a something I don't understand with the way
libtool is working when building the pixman library, and I hope someone
c
On 7/28/2010 2:24 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>
> I have a tinderbox which does daily builds of the X.Org stack for
> cygwin, and I've come across a something I don't understand with the way
> libtool is working when building the pixman library, and I hope someone
> can shed a bit of light.
> (lt_upda
I have a tinderbox which does daily builds of the X.Org stack for cygwin, and
I've come across a something I don't understand with the way libtool is
working when building the pixman library, and I hope someone can shed a bit of
light.
pixman's 'make check' runs various uninstalled test prog
5 matches
Mail list logo