RE: once more unto the breech - still hanging, but I have a little more info.

2006-02-09 Thread Dave Korn
On 09 February 2006 17:48, John W. Eaton wrote: >>> You just dumped 5 meg of useless spam into the inboxes of several >>> thousand people. You just ate up dozens of gigabytes of >>> sourceware.org's bandwidth, which are a scarce resource, paid for >>> out of hard-earned donations and sponsorshi

Re: once more unto the breech - still hanging, but I have a little more info.

2006-02-09 Thread John W. Eaton
| > You just dumped 5 meg of useless spam into the inboxes of several | > thousand people. You just ate up dozens of gigabytes of | > sourceware.org's bandwidth, which are a scarce resource, paid for | > out of hard-earned donations and sponsorship. Sorry to waste additional bandwith with

Re: once more unto the breech - still hanging, but I have a little more info.

2006-02-09 Thread Peter Rehley
On Feb 9, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Dave Korn wrote: On 09 February 2006 00:49, Peter Rehley wrote: On Jan 11, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Peter Rehley wrote: You just dumped 5 meg of useless spam into the inboxes of several thousand people. You just ate up dozens of gigabytes of sourceware.org's bandw

RE: once more unto the breech - still hanging, but I have a little more info.

2006-02-09 Thread Dave Korn
On 09 February 2006 00:49, Peter Rehley wrote: > On Jan 11, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Peter Rehley wrote: You just dumped 5 meg of useless spam into the inboxes of several thousand people. You just ate up dozens of gigabytes of sourceware.org's bandwidth, which are a scarce resource, paid for out of