Re: non-BMP character width

2009-09-24 Thread andy.koppe
2009/9/24 Thomas Wolff: > I also tried to test eucJP, but that doesn't seem to work at all and mintty > crashes... Ouch. Details? > The problem used to be in mintty as well until I pointed it out and > Andy was so ambitious to find a workaround Yep, given a font that actually supports them, e.g

Re: non-BMP character width

2009-09-24 Thread Thomas Wolff
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Can you please create a simple self-contained testcase? I'm not exactly > sure how this is supposed to work and if a solution exists. Is that a > problem for the non-UTF-8 case, too, or for UTF-8 only? Sorry for the late response; I see you reproduced the case meanwhile

Re: non-BMP character width

2009-09-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 22 06:57, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Sure. I was specificially asking for a testcase, preferrably in > > plain C, which allows to reproduce this under a debugger. > > Actually, I can't reproduce that, but I guess it's a problem of the > specific console he's using (T

Re: non-BMP character width

2009-09-21 Thread Lapo Luchini
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Sure. I was specificially asking for a testcase, preferrably in > plain C, which allows to reproduce this under a debugger. Actually, I can't reproduce that, but I guess it's a problem of the specific console he's using (Thomas, which one is that?): on mintty it works ok

Re: non-BMP character width

2009-09-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 21 18:52, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Sep 16 13:48, Thomas Wolff wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I see one small remaining glitch with Unicode display; non-BMP characters > >> (those with Unicode value > 0x) are displayed as two boxes. > > > > Can you please create a simp

Re: non-BMP character width

2009-09-21 Thread Lapo Luchini
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 16 13:48, Thomas Wolff wrote: >> Hi, >> I see one small remaining glitch with Unicode display; non-BMP characters >> (those with Unicode value > 0x) are displayed as two boxes. > > Can you please create a simple self-contained testcase? I'm not exactly > sure

Re: non-BMP character width

2009-09-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 16 13:48, Thomas Wolff wrote: > Hi, > I see one small remaining glitch with Unicode display; non-BMP characters > (those with Unicode value > 0x) are displayed as two boxes. > The reason is probably related to their representation as two > surrogates at some point. > I do not expect to

non-BMP character width

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Wolff
Hi, I see one small remaining glitch with Unicode display; non-BMP characters (those with Unicode value > 0x) are displayed as two boxes. The reason is probably related to their representation as two surrogates at some point. I do not expect to have visible display of non-BMP in the cygwin c