On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 08:11:23AM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
>2006/1/26, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:39:14AM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>> >>Has a fix been found for building emacs on the new cygwin versions 5.19
>> >>and up yet?
>> >
>> >Yes - browse the lis
2006/1/26, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:39:14AM +, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>Has a fix been found for building emacs on the new cygwin versions 5.19
> >>and up yet?
> >
> >Yes - browse the list archives - the idea is that anywhere that emacs
> >uses a non-zer
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:43:29AM +0900, djh wrote:
> Has a fix been found for building emacs on the new cygwin versions
> 5.19 and up yet?
>
> There is at least one problem with d_ino as you know.
I thought you said you'd worked around that (though you didn't
share what your actual changes).
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:39:14AM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>>Has a fix been found for building emacs on the new cygwin versions 5.19
>>and up yet?
>
>Yes - browse the list archives - the idea is that anywhere that emacs
>uses a non-zero d_ino to mean the entry returned from readdir is valid,
>just
> Has a fix been found for building emacs on the new cygwin versions
> 5.19 and up yet?
Yes - browse the list archives - the idea is that anywhere that
emacs uses a non-zero d_ino to mean the entry returned from
readdir is valid, just add a small patch to that area of code that
treats ALL director
Has a fix been found for building emacs on the new cygwin versions
5.19 and up yet?
There is at least one problem with d_ino as you know.
An possibly another, since temacs crashes with a stack dump,
during bootstrap.
cygwin distribution has an early emacs in it. Will it still run on
the newer 5
6 matches
Mail list logo
