Re: modified poll() patch

2002-03-21 Thread Jason Tishler
Boris, On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:14:13PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:35:51PM +0100, Boris Schaeling wrote: > > > thanks for the patch but could you please send a diff related to > > > the latest from current cvs? I didn't back out your patch since > > > > I've a

Re: modified poll() patch

2002-03-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
PROTECTED] > > Betreff: Re: modified poll() patch > > > [...] > > thanks for the patch but could you please send a diff related to > > the latest from current cvs? I didn't back out your patch since > > Hi Corinna, > > I've attached patch and changel

AW: modified poll() patch

2002-03-19 Thread Boris Schaeling
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag > von Corinna Vinschen > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. März 2002 11:55 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: modified poll() patch > [...] > thanks for the patch but coul

Re: modified poll() patch

2002-03-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 02:56:37PM +0100, Boris Schaeling wrote: > Here is the new poll() patch. Now invalid descriptors are recognized Boris, thanks for the patch but could you please send a diff related to the latest from current cvs? I didn't back out your patch since I'd waited for your cor

modified poll() patch

2002-03-16 Thread Boris Schaeling
Here is the new poll() patch. Now invalid descriptors are recognized (invalid = positive descriptors including 0 which are not open). If there are invalid descriptors poll() returns immediately with the count of invalid descriptors. The timer value is ignored. That's the way Linux handles this cas