Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 19.10.2014 12:11, schrieb Helmut Karlowski:
Am 19.10.2014, 09:48 Uhr, schrieb Duncan Roe:
bash at least has "shopt -s checkwinsize" to achieve what you want,
That would be a workaround for bash. Ideally every process should
forward the WINCH-signal to its parent, or t
Am 19.10.2014 12:11, schrieb Helmut Karlowski:
Am 19.10.2014, 09:48 Uhr, schrieb Duncan Roe:
bash at least has "shopt -s checkwinsize" to achieve what you want,
That would be a workaround for bash. Ideally every process should
forward the WINCH-signal to its parent, or the terminal should wa
Am 19.10.2014, 09:48 Uhr, schrieb Duncan Roe:
bash at least has "shopt -s checkwinsize" to achieve what you want,
That would be a workaround for bash. Ideally every process should forward
the WINCH-signal to its parent, or the terminal should walk through the
call-tree. Both not very likel
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:02:33PM +0100, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
>
> When I run for example an editor from a shell in a mintty-window and change
> the window-size the editor is informed by a WINCH-signal. That is good. But
> the shell it was started from does not know about the change, so after
>
When I run for example an editor from a shell in a mintty-window and
change the window-size the editor is informed by a WINCH-signal. That is
good. But the shell it was started from does not know about the change, so
after exiting the editor the shell uses the old size. Could mintty send a
5 matches
Mail list logo