Re: minor mount issue in 1.7

On Sep 25 11:07, Karl M wrote: > Hi Corinna... > > Its not a problem. I just mentioned it because in general "mount -m" only > lists attributes that differ from the default. Yeah, right. Well, as long as it doesn't hurt, it's quite low on the priority list, as you might guess ;) Thanks, Corinn

RE: minor mount issue in 1.7

butes that differ from the default. =20 Thanks=2C =20 ...Karl =20 > Date: Fri=2C 25 Sep 2009 19:19:09 +0200 > From: corinna > Subject: Re: minor mount issue in 1.7 > > On Sep 25 08:27=2C Karl M wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi All... >> >> Typing "mount -m

Re: minor mount issue in 1.7

On Sep 25 08:27, Karl M wrote: > > > > Hi All... > > Typing "mount -m" displays > > $ mount -m > none / cygdrive text,exec,noacl,posix=0 0 0 > > even though posix=0 is the default, derived from fstab > > $ cat /etc/fstab > none / cygdrive text,exec,noacl 0 0 Is that actually a problem

minor mount issue in 1.7

Hi All... Typing "mount -m" displays $ mount -m none / cygdrive text,exec,noacl,posix=0 0 0 even though posix=0 is the default, derived from fstab $ cat /etc/fstab none / cygdrive text,exec,noacl 0 0 Thanks, ...Karl