On 9/13/2012 8:40 AM, Boemker, Tim wrote:
On 9/12/2012 8:03 PM, Larry Hall wrote:
No because with Windows paths Cygwin doesn't look at Windows ACLs. It
just reports a default set of ugo permissions.
Where does it get the default set of ugo permissions?
Like I said before, they are hard-cod
On 9/12/2012 8:03 PM, Larry Hall wrote:
> No because with Windows paths Cygwin doesn't look at Windows ACLs. It
> just reports a default set of ugo permissions.
Where does it get the default set of ugo permissions?
Thanks.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On 9/12/2012 2:57 PM, Boemker, Tim wrote:
Larry,
Do you mean that, with a POSIX path, I get ACL-based permissions, but
with Windows paths, I get just user-group-other permissions?
Not quite. The POSIX path will give you the correct mapping of Windows
ACLs into ugo plus any additional ACLS th
Larry,
Do you mean that, with a POSIX path, I get ACL-based permissions, but with
Windows paths, I get just user-group-other permissions?
That sounds reasonable, but shouldn't they agree as far as they overlap? In
the following example, for example, shouldn't they agree whether foo is
writabl
On 9/12/2012 8:20 AM, Boemker, Tim wrote:
ls reports different permissions for the same file, depending on whether I
provide a Windows-form path or a UNIX-form path:
$ /bin/ls -ldi c:/apps/amq-versions/amq.12.1.0-RC42/conf
/cygdrive/c/apps/amq-versions/amq.12.1.0-RC42/conf
7318349394635879 drw
5 matches
Mail list logo