On Feb 9 22:50, diod lightbulb wrote:
> On 9 February 2015 at 21:28, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> > Am 09.02.2015 um 16:37 schrieb diod lightbulb:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> 1- For pre-existing files/directories under /cygdrive/d and /cygdrive/e
> >> All my file permissions that were correctly reported by
On Feb 9 22:00, diod lightbulb wrote:
> However, I'd like to ask somthing else, is there a way to make newly
> created files outside my home to respect my umask? I just tried touch
> still buggy; ll stillbuggy reports -rw-rwxr--+ while stat -c " %a %u
> %g" stillbuggy gives back " stillbuggy
Greetings, diod lightbulb!
> All I can do now is apparently to run all my pre-existing files thru
> setfacl -b (I like to keep my files with 644 permissions) followed by
> chmod. I just have to figure out how to retain the execution bit for
> the few select executables that need it.
> However, I'
On 9 February 2015 at 21:28, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 09.02.2015 um 16:37 schrieb diod lightbulb:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> 1- For pre-existing files/directories under /cygdrive/d and /cygdrive/e
>> All my file permissions that were correctly reported by ls -l as
>> rw-r--r-- became all of a sudden -rw-rwx
On 9 February 2015 at 17:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 9 16:37, diod lightbulb wrote:
>> HI all,
>>
>> Maybe this is a regression. This is linked to the problem reported in
>> this other thread https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00100.html .
>> I took notice of
>> it right after I upd
Am 09.02.2015 um 16:37 schrieb diod lightbulb:
...
1- For pre-existing files/directories under /cygdrive/d and /cygdrive/e
All my file permissions that were correctly reported by ls -l as
rw-r--r-- became all of a sudden -rw-rwxr--+ ??? The same for
directories where all previously 755 dirs cam
On Feb 9 16:37, diod lightbulb wrote:
> HI all,
>
> Maybe this is a regression. This is linked to the problem reported in
> this other thread https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00100.html .
> I took notice of
> it right after I updated cygwin (setup.exe 2.867) today.
Does https://cygwin.com
HI all,
Maybe this is a regression. This is linked to the problem reported in
this other thread https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00100.html .
I took notice of
it right after I updated cygwin (setup.exe 2.867) today.
My umask is 022. The drives are NTFS. CYGWIN is set to ntsec even if I
jus
8 matches
Mail list logo