On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:47:15PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:59:35PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
I don't think it is that simple. Cygwin doesn't use the getopt that
comes with newlib.
>>>
>>> Ah. Just be
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:59:35PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> I don't think it is that simple. Cygwin doesn't use the getopt that
>>> comes with newlib.
>>
>> Ah. Just because I'm curious, why?
>>
>>> Is there supposed to be any correspon
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:59:35PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I don't think it is that simple. Cygwin doesn't use the getopt that
>> comes with newlib.
>
>Ah. Just because I'm curious, why?
>
>> Is there supposed to be any correspondence between
>> the getopt version a
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't think it is that simple. Cygwin doesn't use the getopt that
> comes with newlib.
Ah. Just because I'm curious, why?
> Is there supposed to be any correspondence between
> the getopt version and the getsubopt version?
I've just looked at newlib's getsubopt.c.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:53:02PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 04:49:04PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> It appears getsubopt is in newlib, and so present in Cygwin's
>>> , but not exported from cygwin1.dll
>>>
>>> One of Cygwin's core developers w
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 04:49:04PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> It appears getsubopt is in newlib, and so present in Cygwin's
>> , but not exported from cygwin1.dll
>>
>> One of Cygwin's core developers will need to tell us whether this is
>> accidental or on purpose.
-
At 09:32 2003-01-19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 04:49:04PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>It appears getsubopt is in newlib, and so present in Cygwin's
>, but not exported from cygwin1.dll
>
>One of Cygwin's core developers will need to tell us whether this is
>accidental or on
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 04:49:04PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>It appears getsubopt is in newlib, and so present in Cygwin's
>, but not exported from cygwin1.dll
>
>One of Cygwin's core developers will need to tell us whether this is
>accidental or on purpose.
Oh, it's on purpose. Believe me. Cau
It appears getsubopt is in newlib, and so present in Cygwin's
, but not exported from cygwin1.dll
One of Cygwin's core developers will need to tell us whether this is
accidental or on purpose.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http:/
Hi,
I try to compile this simple program on cygwin:
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
getsubopt(0,0,0);
return 0;
}
gcc has no problem with the program, but when linking starts, the linker can't find
a reference to getsubopt.
I don't care about the program working or not, I jus
10 matches
Mail list logo