Re: libexif: one version for binaries, another version for source

2005-12-24 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
David Arnstein wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 06:35:30PM -0600, Ren? Berber wrote: > >>If you want the source for version 0.6.12-1 just select the source (put the x in >>the 4th column) don't change the versions. > > > I did exactly as you said above. The GUI of Cygwin setup.exe > definitely i

Re: libexif: one version for binaries, another version for source

2005-12-24 Thread David Arnstein
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 06:35:30PM -0600, Ren? Berber wrote: > If you want the source for version 0.6.12-1 just select the source (put the x > in > the 4th column) don't change the versions. I did exactly as you said above. The GUI of Cygwin setup.exe definitely indicated I was about to download

Re: libexif: one version for binaries, another version for source

2005-12-24 Thread René Berber
David Arnstein wrote: > When I run the Cygwin setup.exe, it shows that my libexif package is up > to date at version 0.6.12-1. But when I use setup.exe to download the > source, I get these three files in /usr/src: > libexif-0.6.9-1.sh > libexif-0.6.9-1.patch > libexif-0.6.9.tar.gz* >

libexif: one version for binaries, another version for source

2005-12-24 Thread David Arnstein
When I run the Cygwin setup.exe, it shows that my libexif package is up to date at version 0.6.12-1. But when I use setup.exe to download the source, I get these three files in /usr/src: libexif-0.6.9-1.sh libexif-0.6.9-1.patch libexif-0.6.9.tar.gz* What should I do? I n