On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:06:49AM -0500, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>FWIW, I found ANOTHER race yesterday while running the cygwin test
>>suite. So, it's back to square one for testing since it was in low
>>level code which could affect everything. And, this race has been t
Christopher Faylor wrote:
FWIW, I found ANOTHER race yesterday while running the cygwin test
suite. So, it's back to square one for testing since it was in low
level code which could affect everything. And, this race has been there
since I screwed up in September 2001. Lovely.
Well, I can't brea
> I don't see how it could be worthwhile since cygwin doesn't use posix
> threads or even posix mutexes under the hood.
Sorry for my stupidity. The tools are probably very OS specific anyway. Just
trying to help. Oh well.
Pete
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
P
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:36:56PM -0800, Peter J. Stieber wrote:
>If you think it's worth it, I could take a stab at building it for you.
I don't see how it could be worthwhile since cygwin doesn't use posix
threads or even posix mutexes under the hood.
--
Christopher Faylor
Cygwin Project Leader
> I wonder if there is a super-secret club out there somewhere that I can
> now join having spent the last four months wrapping my head around
> subtle multi-threaded race conditions. My wife has not quite picked up
> on the fact that when I have a certain pained intense look on my face,
> I'm rea
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:21:38PM -0500, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now
>>with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits.
>>
>>I'm sure this is just because of the magical way in which I have my
>>syst
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now
with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits.
I'm sure this is just because of the magical way in which I have my
system set up but could anyone confirm or deny whether that this
snapshot behav
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:33:33PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now
>>with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits.
>Me too :-D it runs without error for 10h with 3300 iterations now.
I've b
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now
with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits.
Me too :-D it runs without error for 10h with 3300 iterations now.
I'm sure this is just because of the magical way in which I have my
system set
I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now
with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits.
I'm sure this is just because of the magical way in which I have my
system set up but could anyone confirm or deny whether that this
snapshot behaves better?
If it does st
10 matches
Mail list logo
