Re: inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells

2011-03-31 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Le 31/03/2011 04:47, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) a écrit : On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 02:10 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: /etc/shells is missing some shells : /bin/ash /bin/csh /bin/mksh /usr/bin/ash /usr/bin/csh /usr/bin/mksh and maybe more ? ash is just a copy of dash, and csh is a symlink to tcsh. Ho

Re: inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells

2011-03-30 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/30/2011 10:47 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 02:10 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: >> /etc/shells is missing some shells : >> >> /bin/ash >> /bin/csh >> /bin/mksh >> /usr/bin/ash >> /usr/bin/csh >> /usr/bin/mksh >> >> and maybe more ? > > ash is just a copy of dash, and cs

Re: inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells

2011-03-30 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 02:10 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > /etc/shells is missing some shells : > > /bin/ash > /bin/csh > /bin/mksh > /usr/bin/ash > /usr/bin/csh > /usr/bin/mksh > > and maybe more ? ash is just a copy of dash, and csh is a symlink to tcsh. However, you are certainly correct ab

inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells

2011-03-30 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Hi, /etc/shells is missing some shells : /bin/ash /bin/csh /bin/mksh /usr/bin/ash /usr/bin/csh /usr/bin/mksh and maybe more ? Regards, Cyrille Lefevre -- mailto:cyrille.lefevre-li...@laposte.net -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.