On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:27:34PM -0500, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Rolf Campbell wrote:
>>This test does fail (in the same way) on non-hyperthreaded machines
>>(Win2000Pro on a PIII). But, this is a regression from 1.5.12 (that
>>test runs fine on the non-HT machine with 1.5.12. There was (maybe
Rolf Campbell wrote:
This test does fail (in the same way) on non-hyperthreaded machines
(Win2000Pro on a PIII). But, this is a regression from 1.5.12 (that
test runs fine on the non-HT machine with 1.5.12. There was (maybe
still is) a problem with running "make -j" without the max task counte
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: 08 February 2005 08:48
> On Feb 8 09:31, J?rg Schaible wrote:
> > Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
> > > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >> Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreadi
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:17:52AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
Which system configuration did you use to recreate the problem?
I got enough donations to purchase the following:
Motherboard: ASUS P4P800SE
Memory: 1G
CPU: CPU P4/3.0EGHz 800M 478P/1MB HT RT
HD: Samsung 1
On Feb 8 09:31, J?rg Schaible wrote:
> Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have
> >> run three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
> >> Previously, I had pr
Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have
>> run three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
>> Previously, I had problems within minutes.
>
> Go, you! Someone s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher,
thanks for the explanation (I read, and even understood it) Good
job (Explanation and partial fix).
With kind Regards|\
e-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 2:44 PM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: hyperthreading fix, try #1
>
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:17:52AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
> >W
Dave Korn wrote:
I thought you meant CGF should be promoted to Sherriff!
Oh no! He's much to mean for being promoted to Sherriff.
Think of the children!
But those gold stars are more then well deserved. Thanks cgf!
Regards
mks
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
P
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:17:52AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
>Which system configuration did you use to recreate the problem?
I got enough donations to purchase the following:
Motherboard:ASUS P4P800SE
Memory: 1G
CPU:CPU P4/3.0EGHz 800M 478P/1MB HT RT
HD: Sa
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:32:09AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
> >>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems.
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of CV
> Sent: 07 February 2005 18:54
> CV hotmail.com> writes:
> > Another vote for the silver star !
>
> Oops, I meant the gold star of course !
>
> Cheers CV
>
I thought you meant CGF should be promoted to Sherriff!
cheers
CV hotmail.com> writes:
> Another vote for the silver star !
Oops, I meant the gold star of course !
Cheers CV
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
> I'm not naive enough to think that I've solved all of the hyperthreading
> problems but I would like people to try today's snapshot (or any
> snapshot newer than today's) and report on whether it solves the problem
> or not. If it doesn't, please provide
Volker Bandke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf,
a) Your test case fails on my machine as well, right at the
beginning
b) I seem to remember that there was/is a separate problem with "make
- -j", even on non-hyperthreasd machines. Unfortunately I cannot
search
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:32:09AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts for fou
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
> > >three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
> > >Previously, I had problems within
On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
> >three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
> >Previously, I had problems within minutes.
>
> Go, you! Someone should give you a gold
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
Previously, I had problems within minutes.
Go, you! Someone should give you a gold star for this.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf,
a) Your test case fails on my machine as well, right at the
beginning
b) I seem to remember that there was/is a separate problem with "make
- -j", even on non-hyperthreasd machines. Unfortunately I cannot
search the mailing list ri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FWIW, the test case I have been using is now running for 12 ours,
and has done several million iterations. From that point of view the
problem seems to be fixed. Now to run the "real" test case -
building Hercules
Which system configuration did
Christopher Faylor wrote:
[...]
Anyway, I took a look at the pipe handling code for the 457th time and
this time I saw a couple of obvious flaws in my logic. The
synchronization was all off.
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts fo
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 07:22:48PM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
>I have started my test script about half an hour ago, and it is still
>running. It never managed to do that before. This could be a good
>sign. Now, the snapshot DLL is far larger than the standard dll (I
>would ASSume because of de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have started my test script about half an hour ago, and it is still
running. It never managed to do that before. This could be a good
sign. Now, the snapshot DLL is far larger than the standard dll (I
would ASSume because of debug info). Can t
I have a system set up now so, last week, in between real work fire
drills and the sourceware.org emergency, I tried running a couple of the
scripts that were advertised as causing problems.
Well, whaddaya know? I got a hang and/or "other weird behavior".
After checking backtraces on a couple of
25 matches
Mail list logo
