Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:55:02PM +0900, wynfield wrote: >Brian Dessent wrote: >>Build gettext yourself if you want a newer version. This is FOSS, >>you're not helpless. > >Brian, its known at times, that you make really lame statements, but >the one above is beneath even you, I thought. Actuall

Re: gcc 4.3 (was: gettext latest vers. 0.17)

2008-04-05 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello I have read your reply with a great interest. I do not know that you have remember it we have discussed the EH on octave. I do not want to discuss the matter here. I also have build GCC-4.3.0(gcc, gfortran, g++). The build by gnuplot4.3 by GCC-4.3.0. It have been done without problem and th

Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-05 Thread wynfield
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:56:15PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > >Build gettext yourself if you want a newer version. This is FOSS, > >you're not helpless. > > TIFYNH. I like it. > > cgf Chris, you must not have been fully coherent when you wro

Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-05 Thread wynfield
Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My question is the usage of "cygport" really required to be used. I > > certainly > Of course it's not required. The maintainer can use any method he > wants. The fact that Chuck switched *to* cygport from the previous

gcc 4.3 (was: gettext latest vers. 0.17)

2008-04-05 Thread Brian Dessent
Eric Lilja wrote: > Sorry for this hijack but, Brian, is there in a fact a mail adress brian > {at} dessent {dot} net and do you check it or are you simply ignoring > the questions I mailed you? ;) Yes, that is my email address and yes I read messages sent there. I'm sorry that I didn't reply.

Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-05 Thread Eric Lilja
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 11:45:12AM +0200, Eric Lilja wrote: Brian Dessent wrote: [snip] Sorry for this hijack but, Brian, is there in a fact a mail adress brian {at} dessent {dot} net and do you check it or are you simply ignoring the questions I mailed you? ;) If yo

Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 11:45:12AM +0200, Eric Lilja wrote: > Brian Dessent wrote: > [snip] >Sorry for this hijack but, Brian, is there in a fact a mail adress >brian {at} dessent {dot} net and do you check it or are you simply >ignoring the questions I mailed you? ;) If you are asking private cy

Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-05 Thread Eric Lilja
Brian Dessent wrote: [snip] Sorry for this hijack but, Brian, is there in a fact a mail adress brian {at} dessent {dot} net and do you check it or are you simply ignoring the questions I mailed you? ;) - Eric -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:56:15PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Build gettext yourself if you want a newer version. This is FOSS, >you're not helpless. TIFYNH. I like it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.ht

Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-04 Thread Brian Dessent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My question is the usage of "cygport" really required to be used. I > certainly Of course it's not required. The maintainer can use any method he wants. The fact that Chuck switched *to* cygport from the previous homegrown g-b-s method he used should tell you someth

Re: gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-04 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just as the person below noted that the latest version of gettext, 0.17 was needed, I found myself also needing it. I expect that more and more newer versions and updates will be requiring it. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-03/msg00220.html The current cygwin gettext

gettext latest vers. 0.17

2008-04-04 Thread wynfield
Just as the person below noted that the latest version of gettext, 0.17 was needed, I found myself also needing it. I expect that more and more newer versions and updates will be requiring it. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-03/msg00220.html The current cygwin gettext package is over two yea