On Aug 7 19:27, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote:
> > Please give it a try.
>
> diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_process.cc
> b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_process.cc
> index 2a06554..2305b53 100644
> --- a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_process.cc
> +++ b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_proce
> Please give it a try.
diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_process.cc
b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_process.cc
index 2a06554..2305b53 100644
--- a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_process.cc
+++ b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_process.cc
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ format_process_stat (void *data, char *&destbuf)
unsign
On Aug 7 00:45, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote:
> > You seem to have worked it out already so please send a patch in
> > git format-patch foramt to the cygwin-patches mailing list.
>
> I tried :-/
>
> :
> Sorry, only subscribers may post. (#5.7.2)
There are no subscribtio
> You seem to have worked it out already so please send a patch in
> git format-patch foramt to the cygwin-patches mailing list.
I tried :-/
:
Sorry, only subscribers may post. (#5.7.2)
I do not use git to pull Cygwin sources. The last snapshot (that corresponds
to the last-known-stable releas
On Aug 6 18:54, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote:
> I have noticed a discrepancy between the process priority shown by
> "top" vs. what getpriority() returns.
>
> I'm using the procps-based "top", so it reads the priority value from
> /proc/PID/stat. The value gets there via
I have noticed a discrepancy between the process priority shown by "top" vs.
what getpriority() returns.
I'm using the procps-based "top", so it reads the priority value from
/proc/PID/stat. The value gets there via code found in "fhandler_process.cc":
/* The BasePriority returned to a 32 bi
6 matches
Mail list logo
