Re: getmntent extended

2004-11-02 Thread Reini Urban
Igor Pechtchanski schrieb: On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Reini Urban wrote: Igor Pechtchanski schrieb: On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote: Is it possible to let getmntent() i.e. fillout_mntent() return something more appropriate? or would this break existing apps? getmntent() currently returns either "sy

Re: getmntent extended

2004-11-02 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Reini Urban wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski schrieb: > > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote: > > > Is it possible to let getmntent() i.e. fillout_mntent() > > > return something more appropriate? > > > or would this break existing apps? > > > > > > getmntent() currently returns

Re: getmntent extended

2004-11-02 Thread Reini Urban
Igor Pechtchanski schrieb: On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote: Is it possible to let getmntent() i.e. fillout_mntent() return something more appropriate? or would this break existing apps? getmntent() currently returns either "system" or "user" (user or system mounts), which are kinda strange f

Re: getmntent extended

2004-11-01 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote: > Is it possible to let getmntent() i.e. fillout_mntent() > return something more appropriate? > or would this break existing apps? > > getmntent() currently returns either "system" or "user" (user or system > mounts), which are kinda strange fstype names. >

getmntent extended

2004-10-31 Thread Reini Urban
Is it possible to let getmntent() i.e. fillout_mntent() return something more appropriate? or would this break existing apps? getmntent() currently returns either "system" or "user" (user or system mounts), which are kinda strange fstype names. I expected them to return something like "msdos", "p