On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:17:29PM -0400, Ethan Tira-Thompson wrote:
> For a quick example, try figuring out why this example program is
> crashing... The idea is simple: set up an array of strings containing
> 'a' through 'z', build a string from 100 random selections, and then
> display the
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:17:29PM -0400, Ethan Tira-Thompson wrote:
>Wait, wait, don't give up so quickly -- this is the same problem I
>reported a while back as well, and I'd like to see a better
>resolution than "doctor, it hurts when I move my arm"; "well then
>don't move your arm!" ...so
Wait, wait, don't give up so quickly -- this is the same problem I
reported a while back as well, and I'd like to see a better
resolution than "doctor, it hurts when I move my arm"; "well then
don't move your arm!" ...some of us actually need to use our arms.
Maybe you can get around using
That's all I needed to know.
So in order for the process I'm attaching gdb to to terminate on its own I
must not use anything that ends up in a windows dll.
In the mingw/msys sources (msys\rt\src\newlib\libc\sys\go32\sleep.c) I found
a sleep impl (DJ Delorie, 1991) that emulates the sleep functi
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:06:11AM -0700, Hans Horn wrote:
>Exactly, thread 1 is of interest. That's the reason why the code posted
>switches to thread 1!
I apologize for missing that but I did tell you that the stack trace
would not be useful if the program was stopped in a Windows DLL, which
it
On 20 September 2006 16:06, Hans Horn wrote:
> The real question is as to why the parent process needs to go into a
> while(1) loop in order to produce the desired trace.
Because then you're running in the program code, whereas in the sleep
function you've ended up in a windows dll function and
Exactly, thread 1 is of interest. That's the reason why the code posted
switches to thread 1!
The real question is as to why the parent process needs to go into a
while(1) loop in order to produce the desired trace.
H.
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:06:45AM -0700, Hans Horn wrote:
>for quite some time I was trying to figure out (e.g.
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/58420/focus=58420) how to attach gdb
>to a process in order to produce a useful stacktrace.
>
>All attempts however produced something useless
Group,
for quite some time I was trying to figure out (e.g.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/58420/focus=58420) how to attach gdb
to a process in order to produce a useful stacktrace.
All attempts however produced something useless like the following:
[Switching to thread 1096.0x7f4]
*
9 matches
Mail list logo
