Re: gcc4/gfortran

2008-12-05 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:35:02 -0500, Gustavo Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> According to Gustavo Seabra on 12/3/2008 7:38 AM: >>> 1. Is is safe to remove the old gcc (3.*) packages and replace them by >>> symlinks to the new gcc4 executables?

Re: gcc4/gfortran

2008-12-04 Thread Gustavo Seabra
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Gustavo Seabra on 12/3/2008 7:38 AM: >> 1. Is is safe to remove the old gcc (3.*) packages and replace them by >> symlinks to the new gcc4 executables? > > Read the archives. Dave has mentioned that he is planning on a future > packa

Re: gcc4/gfortran

2008-12-03 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Gustavo Seabra on 12/3/2008 7:38 AM: > 1. Is is safe to remove the old gcc (3.*) packages and replace them by > symlinks to the new gcc4 executables? Read the archives. Dave has mentioned that he is planning on a future packaging of the

gcc4/gfortran

2008-12-03 Thread Gustavo Seabra
Hi All, I recently made a fresh new Cygwin installation. I asked for the full installation of the "devel" category to be installed, which resulted in both gcc and gcc4 to be installed. (BTW, great work with gcc4 package, thanks a lot!!!) I wonder: 1. Is is safe to remove the old gcc (3.*) packag