Re: auto_ptr gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special) problem

2004-01-07 Thread Rolf Campbell
auto_ptr b2 = static_cast< auto_ptr >(a2.getB()); cin.get(); return 0; } If I compile this file with gcc version 3.2.3 (mingw special 20030504-1) no errors ocur (g++ -o autoPtr autoPtr.cpp). But if I try to compile using gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special), with the same command li

auto_ptr gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special) problem

2004-01-07 Thread Marcelo Rezende Módolo
private: int cid_; }; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { A a(1); auto_ptr b = static_cast< auto_ptr >(a.getB()); A a2(2); auto_ptr b2 = static_cast< auto_ptr >(a2.getB()); cin.get(); return 0; } If I compile this file with gcc version 3.2.3 (mingw special 2003

Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-22 Thread Alex Vinokur
"chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > > > >>-- Cygwin -- > >>$ gcc foo.c -o foo1.exe > >>$ gcc foo.c -mno-cygwin -o foo2.exe > >> > >>-- MinGW -- > >>$

Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-22 Thread chris
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote: -- Cygwin -- $ gcc foo.c -o foo1.exe $ gcc foo.c -mno-cygwin -o foo2.exe -- MinGW -- $ gcc foo.c -o foo3.exe 1. What is the difference between foo1.exe and foo2.exe? 2. Is there any difference

Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-22 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:02:09AM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote: >$ gcc -v >[snip] >gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)// More preferably 'cygwin', not 'cygming' So, what are you saying? You want me to change the distribution because you don't like the &#x

Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-22 Thread Alex Vinokur
"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > $ gcc -v > > [snip] > > gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)// More preferably 'cygwin', not 'cygming&

Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-22 Thread Alex Vinokur
"Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > -- Cygwin -- > > $ gcc foo.c -o foo1.exe > > $ gcc foo.c -mno-cygwin -o foo2.exe > > > > -- MinGW -- > > $ gcc foo.c -o foo3.exe > > >

Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote: > -- Cygwin -- > $ gcc foo.c -o foo1.exe > $ gcc foo.c -mno-cygwin -o foo2.exe > > -- MinGW -- > $ gcc foo.c -o foo3.exe > > 1. What is the difference between foo1.exe and foo2.exe? > 2. Is there any difference between

Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-22 Thread Alex Vinokur
"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > $ gcc -v > > [snip] > > gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)// More preferably 'cygwin', not 'cygming&

Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-21 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote: > $ gcc -v > [snip] > gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)// More preferably 'cygwin', not 'cygming' This may actually be correct. "Cygming" = "Cygwin" + "MinGW". gcc does both, you kn

gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)

2003-09-21 Thread Alex Vinokur
$ gcc -v [snip] gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)// More preferably 'cygwin', not 'cygming' = Alex Vinokur mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html =