Re: gcc 2.95_

2004-03-02 Thread Tim Prince
At 02:58 PM 3/2/2004, Erick Castillo wrote: You're absolutely right, gcc version 3.3 does work fine. The problem I'm having is specific to the software I am trying to compile. The application i have compiles with older versions of the compiler and this is why I'm looking for older ones. So one

Re: gcc 2.95_

2004-03-02 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Charles Plager wrote: > Warren Young wrote: > > Erick Castillo wrote: > > > > The application i have compiles with older versions of the compiler > > > > I've found that all of g++ 3.x's new warnings and errors are correct, > > so the "right" solution is to fix your program

Re: gcc 2.95_

2004-03-02 Thread Charles Plager
Warren Young wrote: Erick Castillo wrote: The application i have compiles with older versions of the compiler I've found that all of g++ 3.x's new warnings and errors are correct, so the "right" solution is to fix your program. If it's not your program, I'm sure the developers would apprecia

Re: gcc 2.95_

2004-03-02 Thread Warren Young
Erick Castillo wrote: The application i have compiles with older versions of the compiler I've found that all of g++ 3.x's new warnings and errors are correct, so the "right" solution is to fix your program. If it's not your program, I'm sure the developers would appreciate patches. If you ca

Re: gcc 2.95_

2004-03-02 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Erick Castillo wrote: > Rolf Campbell mailc.net> writes: > > > gcc version 3.3 works fine, gcc v2.95 was broken on cygwin and nobody > > wanted to fix it, so it was discontinued. > > > > Erick Castillo wrote: > > > Need to install gcc 2.95 on the latest cygwin release. gcc ver

Re: gcc 2.95_

2004-03-02 Thread Larry Hall
At 05:58 PM 3/2/2004, you wrote: >Rolf Campbell mailc.net> writes: > >> >> gcc version 3.3 works fine, gcc v2.95 was broken on cygwin and nobody >> wanted to fix it, so it was discontinued. >> >> Erick Castillo wrote: >> > Need to install gcc 2.95 on the latest cygwin release. gcc version 3.3..

Re: gcc 2.95_

2004-03-02 Thread Erick Castillo
Rolf Campbell mailc.net> writes: > > gcc version 3.3 works fine, gcc v2.95 was broken on cygwin and nobody > wanted to fix it, so it was discontinued. > > Erick Castillo wrote: > > Need to install gcc 2.95 on the latest cygwin release. gcc version 3.3... does > > not work properly. Where cou