Re: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]

2002-05-07 Thread David Starks-Browning
On Monday 6 May 02, Christopher Faylor writes: > I'm not going to be issuing any new gcc releases until sometime after > 3.1. > > I guess this needs to be a FAQ or something. OK. David (Cygwin FAQ maintainer) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting:

Gcc-3.1 and binutils under cygwin [Was: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]]

2002-05-06 Thread Christian Jönsson
in package is being worked on. Cheers, /ChJ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert] On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:25:

Re: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]

2002-05-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:25:58PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >Chris, >Would you be willing to accept this patch into the Cygwin gcc source tree? I'm not going to be issuing any new gcc releases until sometime after 3.1. I guess this needs to be a FAQ or something. cgf -- Unsubscribe info:

gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch

2002-05-06 Thread Jason Tishler
Chris, The attached patch eliminates warnings such as the following: In file included from /usr/include/g++-3/set:31, from ../main.cc:145: /usr/include/g++-3/stl_tree.h: In function `int __black_count(_Rb_tree_node_base *, _Rb_tree_node_base *)': /usr/include/g++-3/stl_tree.h:1