Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > I've just upgraded my cygwin1.dll from 20050826 (or something like
that)
> > to 20051018. With 20050826 ls printed errors if called on drive
letters.
> > Now ls works fine, but gcc 2.95 is broken.
>
> That's probably alre
On Oct 19 01:20, Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just upgraded my cygwin1.dll from 20050826 (or something like that)
> to 20051018. With 20050826 ls printed errors if called on drive letters.
> Now ls works fine, but gcc 2.95 is broken.
That's probably already so
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Maybe you can recompile gcc-2.95 if you really must use it?
Do you know where can I find cygwin sources, or at least cygwin patches?
It was removed from the repository in 2003:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Maybe you can recompile gcc-2.95 if you really must use it?
Do you know where can I find cygwin sources, or at least cygwin patches?
It was removed from the repository in 2003:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg01533.html
However there are stale mirrors
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
Do you know where can I find cygwin sources, or at least cygwin patches?
It was removed from the repository in 2003:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg01533.html
However there are stale mirrors out there where it is still available,
Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
$ cat foo.c
int main(){
}
Your example compiles ok with gcc-3.4.4, so why want you use gcc-2.x?
Well, no wonder that int main(){} compiles ok with gcc-3.4.4. This is
the minimal test case.
Maybe you can recompile gcc-2.95 if you really
Christopher Faylor wrote:
After upgrading my Cygwin to 1.5.18, gcc 2.95 doesn't work anymore.
This should be fixed in the latest snapshot. The problem was that the
spawn*() functions in cygwin weren't working reliably and, apparently,
this version of gcc uses spawn.
My regres
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 06:50:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
>After upgrading my Cygwin to 1.5.18, gcc 2.95 doesn't work anymore.
This should be fixed in the latest snapshot. The problem was that the
spawn*() functions in cygwin weren't working reliably and, apparently,
this v
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
$ cat foo.c
int main(){
}
Your example compiles ok with gcc-3.4.4, so why want you use gcc-2.x?
Well, no wonder that int main(){} compiles ok with gcc-3.4.4. This is the
minimal test case.
Maybe you can recompile gcc-2.95 if you really must use it?
Do you know
Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
After upgrading my Cygwin to 1.5.18, gcc 2.95 doesn't work anymore.
The same problem occures with the 20050709 snapshot. Reverting cygwin back
to 1.5.17 makes gcc work again.
I know that gcc 2.95 is unsupported and was removed from the distribution
due to a sever
Erick Castillo wrote:
>
> Need to install gcc 2.95 on the latest cygwin release. gcc version 3.3... does
> not work properly. Where could i find 2.95 if not through the simple cygwin
> install wizard? Will version 2.95 even work on the latest cygwin release? Any
> information o
gcc version 3.3 works fine, gcc v2.95 was broken on cygwin and nobody
wanted to fix it, so it was discontinued.
Erick Castillo wrote:
Need to install gcc 2.95 on the latest cygwin release. gcc version 3.3... does
not work properly. Where could i find 2.95 if not through the simple cygwin
Need to install gcc 2.95 on the latest cygwin release. gcc version 3.3... does
not work properly. Where could i find 2.95 if not through the simple cygwin
install wizard? Will version 2.95 even work on the latest cygwin release? Any
information on this would be incredibly useful. thanks
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: cygwin 1.3.13, gcc 3.2 (no output) and gcc 2.95-3 (output but
> no permission to execute)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulty with g++ after upgrading cygwin.
> Here's a sample
>
> $ g++ -v foo.cpp
>
> [outp
Hi,
I am having some difficulty with g++ after upgrading cygwin. Here's a sample
$ g++ -v foo.cpp
[output snipped, in an attempt to get thru spam filter]
Command returns error 1. It always returns error 1.
A partial solution:
I can just use gcc-2. However, the executables it generates must
15 matches
Mail list logo
