Re: gcc-tools versions of autotools [Fwd: Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11]

2009-08-15 Thread Dave Korn
Charles Wilson wrote: > /not/ update them at all; > 1) The current and soon-to-be-released gcc's, based on gcc-3.4.5 and > gcc-4.3.x, both still require autoconf-2.59 and automake-1.9.6 Good reasoning. > So, as soon as I spin the "regular" cygwin autoconf-2.64 package, then > our "standard" au

gcc-tools versions of autotools [Fwd: Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11]

2009-08-15 Thread Charles Wilson
(Mostly for Dave Korn, but other opinions solicited): How do you want me to handle updating gcc-tools-autoconf and gcc-tools-automake? My preference would be to /not/ update them at all; at least, not for a while. Reasons: 1) The current and soon-to-be-released gcc's, based on gcc-3.4.5 and gcc