Charles Wilson wrote:
> /not/ update them at all;
> 1) The current and soon-to-be-released gcc's, based on gcc-3.4.5 and
> gcc-4.3.x, both still require autoconf-2.59 and automake-1.9.6
Good reasoning.
> So, as soon as I spin the "regular" cygwin autoconf-2.64 package, then
> our "standard" au
(Mostly for Dave Korn, but other opinions solicited):
How do you want me to handle updating gcc-tools-autoconf and
gcc-tools-automake? My preference would be to /not/ update them at all;
at least, not for a while. Reasons:
1) The current and soon-to-be-released gcc's, based on gcc-3.4.5 and
gcc
2 matches
Mail list logo