I usually use FAR manager (non-cygwin Norton Commander clone) (*) for
command-line work and run cygwin programs (like grep, gcc or make)
from it; modifying all programs or writings wrapper scripts for them
is not an option.
May be it makes sense to add umask option to CYGWIN environment
variable ?
Hi,
At 08:00 2002-12-04, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Roman,
Have them call umask(2). If that's not an option, invoke them via a Cygwin
shell script that changes the umask first--it's my child processes just as
environment variables are.
I don't know what kind of editing snafu that was, but I mean
Roman,
Have them call umask(2). If that's not an option, invoke them via a Cygwin
shell script that changes the umask first--it's my child processes just as
environment variables are.
Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA
At 23:44 2002-12-03, Roman Belenov wrote:
Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTE
Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> umask
How can I change umask of processes launched from Windows executables?
--
With regards, Roman.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 09:29:29AM +0300, Roman Belenov wrote:
> I've noticed that executables generated by gcc (cygwin 1.3.17-1, gcc
> 3.2-3, binutils 20021117-1, Windows XP) have Read, Read&Execute and
> Write permissions for group and others, ls -l shows their attributes
> as -rwxrwxrwx . It see
I've noticed that executables generated by gcc (cygwin 1.3.17-1, gcc
3.2-3, binutils 20021117-1, Windows XP) have Read, Read&Execute and
Write permissions for group and others, ls -l shows their attributes
as -rwxrwxrwx . It seems rather strange - I guess that Write
permission for other users is no
6 matches
Mail list logo
