Re: g77 executable with largish array fails

2004-10-26 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote: > The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing test cases. > These used to work on some previous versions of cygwin/g77, but now fail. > > The reduced test case is > > integer n > parameter( n = 39*1024*1024 ) !

RE: g77 executable with largish array fails (solved?)

2004-10-26 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase > Sent: 26 October 2004 08:37 > Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote: > > >>From: David Billinghurst > >> > >>The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing > test cases. > >>These used to work on some p

Re: g77 executable with largish array fails (solved?)

2004-10-26 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote: From: David Billinghurst The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing test cases. These used to work on some previous versions of cygwin/g77, but now fail. I translated the problem into C using f2c. It becomes: $ cat labugc.c int main() { st

RE: g77 executable with largish array fails (solved?)

2004-10-26 Thread Billinghurst, David \(CALCRTS\)
> From: David Billinghurst > > The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing test cases. > These used to work on some previous versions of cygwin/g77, but now fail. I translated the problem into C using f2c. It becomes: $ cat labugc.c int main() { static float a[39*1024*1024];

g77 executable with largish array fails

2004-10-25 Thread Billinghurst, David \(CALCRTS\)
The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing test cases. These used to work on some previous versions of cygwin/g77, but now fail. The reduced test case is integer n parameter( n = 39*1024*1024 ) ! 38*1024*1024 is OK reala(n) end When compiled with c