On 5/9/2017 7:40 PM, Leon Meier wrote:
@Ken: Thank you for updating texlive! fontspec v2.6a works like a charm; the
nasty bug is out.
Glad to hear it. Thanks for the feedback.
Ken
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq
@Ken: Thank you for updating texlive! fontspec v2.6a works like a charm;
the nasty bug is out.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
Dear Ken:
fontspec is part of the Cygwin texlive-collection-latexrecommended
package. Just rebuilding that package with an updated fontspec partially
solves the problem, in the sense that your test case compiles under
xelatex and lualatex and displays properly. But the compilation yields
the
On 5/3/2017 7:30 PM, Леон Майер wrote:
Dear texlive maintainers, might I ask you to update fontspec to v2.6 or newer.
Reason: a nasty bug, see
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/367559/emph-in-theorem-with-unicode-math-and-amsthm
fontspec is part of the Cygwin texlive-collection
Dear texlive maintainers, might I ask you to update fontspec to v2.6 or newer.
Reason: a nasty bug, see
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/367559/emph-in-theorem-with-unicode-math-and-amsthm
Thanks in advance!
Leon
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ
5 matches
Mail list logo