Pierre,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 09:12:41AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> While you are at it, can you enhance the educational experience
^^
Serves me right for idle *and* public reflections... :,)
> by looking at the starting wso
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> Using good old fashioned strings and Andre's suggestion I have isolated
> the registry keys requiring read access for Everyone (which did not
> already have it) to the following:
>
> 1. HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Winsock\Parameters
> 2. HKLM\System\Cur
Pierre,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 06:29:01PM -0500, Andre Bleau wrote:
> Sorry to jump in now. A good way to resolve that kind of problem is
> auditing. As administrator, enable auditing. With regedt32, enable
> auditing on selected keys and subkeys for read or write failure, as
> required. You will
Pierre, Jason,
Sorry to jump in now. A good way to resolve that kind of problem is
auditing. As administrator, enable auditing. With regedt32, enable auditing
on selected keys and subkeys for read or write failure, as required. You
will find results in event viewer, in the security log.
Yes,
Jason Tishler wrote:
> Bingo! The following key did not have read access for Everyone:
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM
>
Great!
> After granting access, then exim would start up even though its primary
> group is my mail group and not the Users one.
>
> Do you want me further isolate? If so
Pierre,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:19:03PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >
> > > Another possibility is registry access. Is there a way to insure
> > > that Everyone has read access to the whole registry?
> >
> > regedt32 can change permissions. Any particular subtree
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> > Another possibility is registry access. Is there a way to insure
> > that Everyone has read access to the whole registry?
>
> regedt32 can change permissions. Any particular subtree that I should
> try?
Right, I had forgotten. I am still using regedit.
First see if any
Pierre,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 03:44:03PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> > I tried adding a group:mail:r-x ACL to the following:
> >
> > /mnt/c
> > [snip]
>
> Thanks
No problem.
> > but I still failed in the same way.
>
> With hindsight it's not surprising be
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> Perhaps this is completely off the wall but I don't recall anyone
> answering my question about exim and pthreads. Does exim use threads?
>
No.
Pierre
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 03:44:03PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Jason Tishler wrote:
>>
>> I tried adding a group:mail:r-x ACL to the following:
>>
>> /mnt/c
>> /mnt/c/WINNT
>> /mnt/c/WINNT/system32
>> /mnt/c/WINNT/system32/drivers
>> /mnt/c/WINNT/system32/drivers/etc
>>
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> I tried adding a group:mail:r-x ACL to the following:
>
> /mnt/c
> /mnt/c/WINNT
> /mnt/c/WINNT/system32
> /mnt/c/WINNT/system32/drivers
> /mnt/c/WINNT/system32/drivers/etc
> /mnt/c/WINNT/system32/drivers/etc/services
> /mnt/c/WINNT/system32/*.dll
Pierre,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:43:31PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> > The above fixed the problem. I apologize for not being able to
> > figure this out myself.
>
> Actually I'd rather have you hit this problem than almost anybody
> else. Figuring out what was ha
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> Pierre,
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:02:49AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > So I suggest a simple test: edit /etc/passwd and change the gid of the
> > exim user to 545, then run again.
>
> The above fixed the problem. I apologize for not being able to figure
> th
Pierre,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:02:49AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> So I suggest a simple test: edit /etc/passwd and change the gid of the
> exim user to 545, then run again.
The above fixed the problem. I apologize for not being able to figure
this out myself.
> By the way, I am not s
Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Could you run exim -bd -d -c (skip the -q15m for simplicity) and
> > look at the output. If nothing is obvious, send it to me I will
> > compare it with the output of a local run.
>
> See attached for a 4.10-2 and 4.12-3 run.
>
Jason
4.10-2:
changed uid/gid: running a
Earnie,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:15:56PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Any further suggestions? Note this is very painful to debug because
> >I can't use gdb and I can't send mail when trying to debug. Sigh...
> >:,(
>
> You might try DebugView from sysinternals.com. Th
Pierre,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:15:38PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:06:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > > If you run with -d you will see that exim sheds all supplementary
> > > groups.
> >
> > I was just following the README:
>
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> Pierre,
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:06:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > If you run with -d you will see that exim sheds all supplementary
> > groups.
>
> I was just following the README:
>
>cygrunsrv -I exim -p /usr/bin/exim -e CYGWIN=ntsec \
>
Pierre,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:06:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> If you run with -d you will see that exim sheds all supplementary
> groups.
I was just following the README:
cygrunsrv -I exim -p /usr/bin/exim -e CYGWIN=ntsec \
-a "-bdf -q15m" -d "Exim Mail Transfer Ag
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> Pierre,
>
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:22:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > > This reminds me of something similar, possibly last month. Look for
> > > "exim", "services", "gerritt" In the end it was because exim was
> > > running as a special user who didn't ha
Jason Tishler wrote:
Any further suggestions? Note this is very painful to debug because I
can't use gdb and I can't send mail when trying to debug. Sigh... :,(
You might try DebugView from sysinternals.com. The strace data will
appear in a nice searchable window. This method avoids the it wo
Pierre,
[I'm moving this thread to cygwin@, since it currently doesn't appear to
be a cygwin-developers@ issue...]
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:12:09PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:22:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > This reminds me of something similar, possibly
22 matches
Mail list logo
